Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40114731›Full record

ArticleAsiaIntervention2025

A real-world experience with a thin-strut bioresorbable vascular scaffold system: a single-centre study.

Puneet K Verma, Sanjeev Sroa, Paras Koushal

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AsiaIntervention, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07038408 (Multi-center, Open-label, Prospective, Randomized Study to Show Long-term Efficacy of DCB Treatment With Bail-out BRS in Comparison to BRS Treatment of De-novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions in a Relatively Young PCI Population.), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07038408 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Multi-center, Open-label, Prospective, Randomized Study to Show Long-term Efficacy of DCB Treatment With Bail-out BRS in Comparison to BRS Treatment of De-novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions in a Relatively Young PCI Population.

TypeinterventionalSponsorCeric SàrlRan2026 to 2032Enrolled2,256ConditionsDrug Coated Balloon, Bioresorbable Scaffold, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI), Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS)ArmsAngioplasty with DCB (bail-out BRS), Angioplasty with BRS
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Puneet K VermaACE Heart and Vascular Institute, Mohali, India.
Sanjeev SroaACE Heart and Vascular Institute, Mohali, India.
Paras KoushalPacific Medical College and Hospital, Udaipur, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Despite the significant advancements in interventional cardiology, there is a need for new, metal-free bioresorbable stent systems that preserve the vasomotor function of the treated vessel and decrease the risk of restenosis associated with metal stents and the risk of thrombosis associated with first-generation bioresorbable scaffolds. Aims: The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of the MeRes100 bioresorbable scaffold in complex Methods: We conducted a retrospective single-centre study that included 86 patients with coronary artery disease who had been implanted with a next-generation MeRes100 sirolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold system and followed up to 12 months after the procedure. Results: The scaffold was successfully delivered to the target lesion with satisfactory stent expansion in 98.84% of cases. Only one patient died, and the in-hospital mortality rate was as low as 1.16% (cardiac death). No cases of major adverse cardiac events, cardiac death, myocardial infarction, ischaemia-driven target lesion revascularisation, or scaffold thrombosis were reported during the follow-up. Conclusions: Our preliminary data suggest that the thin-strut sirolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold appears to be a clinically acceptable, safe, reliable and reproducible strategy to treat both

Identifiers

PMID40114731
PMCPMC11905108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.