Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40114711›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology science

AlphaMissense Predictions and ClinVar Annotations: A Deep Learning Approach to Uveal Melanoma.

David J Taylor Gonzalez, Mak B Djulbegovic, Meghan Sharma, Michael Antonietti, Colin K Kim, Vladimir N Uversky, Carol L Karp, Carol L Shields, Matthew W Wilson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

David J Taylor GonzalezBascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami, Miami, Florida.
Mak B DjulbegovicWills Eye Hospital, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Meghan SharmaBascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami, Miami, Florida.
Michael AntoniettiBascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami, Miami, Florida.
Colin K KimBascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami, Miami, Florida.
Vladimir N UverskyDepartment of Molecular Medicine and USF Health Byrd Alzheimer's Research Institute, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida.
Carol L KarpBascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami, Miami, Florida.
Carol L ShieldsOcular Oncology Service, Wills Eye Hospital, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Matthew W WilsonHamilton Eye Institute, University of Tennessee Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee.

Funding

Shared Equipment ModuleP30EY014801 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Dmitry V Ivanov · 2004 to 2026
$12.2M
ChimeraX -- Next Generation Visualization and Analysis Software for Multiscale ModelingR01GM129325 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI FERRIN, THOMAS E · 2018 to 2025
$5.2M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY014801NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM129325
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Uveal melanoma (UM) poses significant diagnostic and prognostic challenges due to its variable genetic landscape. We explore the use of a novel deep learning tool to assess the functional impact of genetic mutations in UM. Design: A cross-sectional bioinformatics exploratory data analysis of genetic mutations from UM cases. Subjects: Genetic data from patients diagnosed with UM were analyzed, explicitly focusing on missense mutations sourced from the Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer (COSMIC) database. Methods: We identified missense mutations frequently observed in UM using the COSMIC database, assessed their potential pathogenicity using AlphaMissense, and visualized mutations using AlphaFold. Clinical significance was cross-validated with entries in the ClinVar database. Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcomes measured were the agreement rates between AlphaMissense predictions and ClinVar annotations regarding the pathogenicity of mutations in critical genes associated with UM, such as Results: Missense substitutions comprised 91.35% (n = 1310) of mutations in UM found on COSMIC. Of the 151 unique missense mutations analyzed in the most frequently mutated genes, only 40.4% (n = 61) had corresponding data in ClinVar. Notably, AlphaMissense provided definitive classifications for 27.2% (n = 41) of the mutations, which were labeled as "unknown significance" in ClinVar, underscoring its potential to offer more clarity in ambiguous cases. When excluding these mutations of uncertain significance, AlphaMissense showed perfect agreement (100%) with ClinVar across all analyzed genes, demonstrating no discrepancies where a mutation predicted as "pathogenic" was classified as "benign" or vice versa. Conclusions: Integrating deep learning through AlphaMissense offers a promising approach to understanding the mutational landscape of UM. Our methodology holds the potential to improve genomic diagnostics and inform the development of personalized treatment strategies for UM. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Indexed as

AlphaFoldAlphaMissenseClinVarCOSMICMissense mutationsUveal melanoma

Identifiers

PMID40114711
PMCPMC11925568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.