ArticleOphthalmology science
AlphaMissense Predictions and ClinVar Annotations: A Deep Learning Approach to Uveal Melanoma.
Article in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep Learning and Experimental Validation of BRCA1-Associated Protein-1 Missense Variant Pathogenicity in Uveal Melanoma.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Benchmarking AlphaMissense against ClinVar for Diagnostic Interpretation of Missense Variants in Inherited Retinal Diseases.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in haematology laboratory diagnosis: Current applications, challenges, and future directions.African journal of laboratory medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: Uveal melanoma (UM) poses significant diagnostic and prognostic challenges due to its variable genetic landscape. We explore the use of a novel deep learning tool to assess the functional impact of genetic mutations in UM. Design: A cross-sectional bioinformatics exploratory data analysis of genetic mutations from UM cases. Subjects: Genetic data from patients diagnosed with UM were analyzed, explicitly focusing on missense mutations sourced from the Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer (COSMIC) database. Methods: We identified missense mutations frequently observed in UM using the COSMIC database, assessed their potential pathogenicity using AlphaMissense, and visualized mutations using AlphaFold. Clinical significance was cross-validated with entries in the ClinVar database. Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcomes measured were the agreement rates between AlphaMissense predictions and ClinVar annotations regarding the pathogenicity of mutations in critical genes associated with UM, such as Results: Missense substitutions comprised 91.35% (n = 1310) of mutations in UM found on COSMIC. Of the 151 unique missense mutations analyzed in the most frequently mutated genes, only 40.4% (n = 61) had corresponding data in ClinVar. Notably, AlphaMissense provided definitive classifications for 27.2% (n = 41) of the mutations, which were labeled as "unknown significance" in ClinVar, underscoring its potential to offer more clarity in ambiguous cases. When excluding these mutations of uncertain significance, AlphaMissense showed perfect agreement (100%) with ClinVar across all analyzed genes, demonstrating no discrepancies where a mutation predicted as "pathogenic" was classified as "benign" or vice versa. Conclusions: Integrating deep learning through AlphaMissense offers a promising approach to understanding the mutational landscape of UM. Our methodology holds the potential to improve genomic diagnostics and inform the development of personalized treatment strategies for UM. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.