Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40114709›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology science

Improving Artificial Intelligence-based Microbial Keratitis Screening Tools Constrained by Limited Data Using Synthetic Generation of Slit-Lamp Photos.

Daniel Wang, Bonnie Sklar, James Tian, Rami Gabriel, Matthew Engelhard, Ryan P McNabb, Anthony N Kuo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Artificial intelligence in microbial keratitis.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Daniel WangDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Bonnie SklarOphthalmology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
James TianOmni Eye Specialists, Fort Collins, Colorado.
Rami GabrielOphthalmology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Matthew EngelhardBiostatistics & Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Ryan P McNabbOphthalmology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Anthony N KuoOphthalmology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.

Funding

VISION RESEARCHP30EY005722 · NEI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Vadim Y Arshavsky · 1985 to 2026
$19.3M
Self-aligning, motion-stabilized ocular imaging for eye care in urgent and emergent care settingsR01EY035534 · NEI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Anthony Nanlin Kuo · 2023 to 2026
$1.5M
Machine Learning Methods to Develop and Deploy Real-Time Risk Surveillance for Autism Spectrum Disorder and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder from the Electronic Health RecordK01MH127309 · NIMH · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Matthew Morrow Engelhard · 2022 to 2026
$842k
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY005722NEI NIH HHS R01 EY035534NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH127309
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: We developed a novel slit-lamp photography (SLP) generative adversarial network (GAN) model using limited data to supplement and improve the performance of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based microbial keratitis (MK) screening model. Design: Cross-sectional study. Subjects: Slit-lamp photographs of 67 healthy and 36 MK eyes were prospectively and retrospectively collected at a tertiary care ophthalmology clinic at a large academic institution. Methods: We trained the GAN model StyleGAN2-ADA on healthy and MK SLPs to generate synthetic images. To assess synthetic image quality, we performed a visual Turing test. Three cornea fellows tested their ability to identify 20 images each of (1) real healthy, (2) real diseased, (3) synthetic healthy, and (4) synthetic diseased. We also used Kernel Inception Distance (KID) to quantitatively measure realism and variation of synthetic images. Using the same dataset used to train the GAN model, we trained 2 DenseNet121 AI models to grade SLP images as healthy or MK with (1) only real images and (2) real supplemented with GAN-generated images. Main Outcome Measures: Classification performance of MK screening models trained with only real images compared to a model trained with both limited real and supplemented synthetic GAN images. Results: For the visual Turing test, the fellows on average rated synthetic images as good quality (83.3% ± 12.0% of images), and synthetic and real images were found to depict pertinent anatomy and pathology for accurate classification (96.3% ± 2.19% of images). These experts could distinguish between real and synthetic images (accuracy: 92.5% ± 9.01%). Analysis of KID score for synthetic images indicated realism and variation. The MK screening model trained on both limited real and supplemented synthetic data (area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve: 0.93, bootstrapping 95% CI: 0.77-1.0) outperformed the model trained with only real data (area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.50-1.0), with an improvement of 0.17 (95% CI: 0-0.4; 2-tailed Conclusions: Artificial intelligence-based MK classification may be improved by supplementation of limited real training data with synthetic data generated by GANs. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceCorneaGenerative adversarial networkMicrobial keratitisSlit-lamp photography

Identifiers

PMID40114709
PMCPMC11925572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.