ArticleRevista Cuidarte
Analysis of health outcomes in acute myocardial infarction: a value-based healthcare approach.
Article in Revista Cuidarte. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Five-year implementation and longitudinal performance of a multidisciplinary acute myocardial infarction program in a middle-income country.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Understanding the impact of value-based healthcare and various healthcare payment models on the health outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is pivotal for guiding clinical strategies and decisions. Objective: To compare health outcomes and costs associated with healthcare for AMI patients under insurance prospective global payment (PGP) and fee-for-service models. Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort study encompassing AMI patients was conducted from 2021-2023. Convenience sampling of participants over 18 years of age diagnosed with type 2 myocardial infarction was conducted. Analysis was based on Colombian healthcare system payment models: PGP and fee-for-service. Results: The study involved 2134 patients, 657 (31%) under PGP and 1477 (69%) under fee-for-service. Length of hospital stay was associated with the payment model (coefficient -0.68, CI 95%: 0.40 to 0.98, p=0.037). Payment models also correlated with costs (845 USD, CI 95%: 87.92 to 1601; p=0.02). In-hospital mortality is not associated with either of the two contracting models. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) totaled 1.6 over a 2-year follow-up. Discussion: It is evident that throughout the care cycle at the Center of Excellence for Acute Myocardial Infarction, there is added value for patients with the PGP model, as the costs are lower and health outcomes comparable to the fee-for-service model. Conclusions: The findings of this study underscore the importance of understanding the relationship between value-based healthcare, different healthcare payment models, and health outcomes in AMI patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.