ArticleRevista Cuidarte
Validation of nursing educational technology for neurogenic bowel rehabilitation in people with spinal cord injury.
Article in Revista Cuidarte. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Considered an unpredictable and recurring problem, Neurogenic Bowel does not resolve over time and progressively worsens, translating into a physical and psychological challenge, significantly reducing Quality of Life. Objective: To construct and validate the face and content of an educational technology for use by nurses in the rehabilitation of Neurogenic Bowel in people with Spinal Cord Injury. Materials and methods: A methodological, quantitative study developed in two stages: the construction of an educational technology on the Canvas platform based on a literature review based on Wanda Horta's Theory of Human Needs and its validation by expert judges. The validation process included nurses with ability in neurogenic bowel in teaching, research or care. The criterion for validation was agreement of over 80%, analyzed using the Content Validation Index and binomial test with confidence intervals of 95.00% (p<0.05). Results: The integrative literature review proved necessary for the construction of the proposed educational technology and covered characteristics of the Neurogenic Bowel, bowel emptying techniques, guidelines and the systematization of nursing care. The protocol was validated by ten expert judges who had graduated in nursing for more than 10 years (100.00%), with an average age of 41.8 years, female (60.00%) and an average training period of 18.6 years. An overall Content Validation Index of 0.96 (p<0.001) was obtained for the items assessed (objective, content, relevance, functionality, efficiency and appearance/diagramming). Discussion: The implementation of an intestinal rehabilitation program aims, above all, to achieve frequent, regular and consistent stools in people with spinal cord injury and nurses, as multipliers of knowledge, can be facilitators in the teaching-learning process for carers, people with this condition and other members of the healthcare team. Conclusion: It can be concluded that the educational technology has been validated and could help the teaching-learning process for nurses in the clinical practice of caring for people with Neurogenic Bowel Disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.