ArticleSurgery open science2025
Perineural invasion in pancreatic cancer: Current biological function in R status, prognosis, and pain.
Article in Surgery open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decoding neuro-tumor interactions in pancreatic cancer: mechanisms, immunosuppressive networks and therapeutic opportunities.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Review
- The substance P/ Neurokinin-1 receptor signaling drives perineural invasion in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Article
- Machine Learning-Based Pathomics Signature for Perineural Invasion in Colorectal Cancer.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025Article
- The association between nutritional risk and survival time among patients with pancreatic cancer following pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is predicted to become the second leading cause of death in 2030 and it is characterized by poor prognosis, recurrence and resistance to therapies. Several factors contribute to the complexity of this disease, among those the invasion of nerves by PDAC cells. This condition, defined as perineural invasion (PNI), is responsible of PDAC progression and pain generation. To date, PNI emerges as a hallmark feature of PDAC, showing the same oncological weight of lymph node metastasis in terms of prognosis. Targeting PNI could help improve prognosis and pain relief in PDAC patients. Only recently, a severity scoring system has been proposed to quantify PNI in histological samples although prospective validation and standardization are strongly advocated. More information about peripancreatic soft tissue infiltration and a "true" curative surgery could be found in understanding the molecular mechanisms of PNI. The incorporation of PNI markers for grading mesopancreas and retroperitoneal invasion is required to overcome current limitations of the histological workup. We discuss the modern understanding of PNI in PDAC, and the state of the art in clinical setting. Although there are still a lot to learn about PDAC, PNI represents one of the biological detonators and an important focus of future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.