ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2025
Breast cancer survivors' perceptual map of breast reconstruction appearance outcomes.
Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: It is often hard for patients to articulate their expectations about breast reconstruction appearance outcomes to their providers. Our overarching goal is to develop a tool to help patients visually express what they expect to look like after reconstruction. We aim to comprehensively understand how breast cancer survivors perceive diverse breast appearance states by mapping them onto a low-dimensional Euclidean space, which simplifies the complex information about perceptual similarity relationships into a more interpretable form. Approach: We recruited breast cancer survivors and conducted observer experiments to assess the visual similarities among clinical photographs depicting a range of appearances of the torso relevant to breast reconstruction. Then, we developed a perceptual map to illuminate how breast cancer survivors perceive and distinguish among these appearance states. Results: We sampled 100 photographs as stimuli and recruited 34 breast cancer survivors locally. The resulting perceptual map, constructed in two dimensions, offers valuable insights into factors influencing breast cancer survivors' perceptions of breast reconstruction outcomes. Our findings highlight specific aspects, such as the number of nipples, symmetry, ptosis, scars, and breast shape, that emerge as particularly noteworthy for breast cancer survivors. Conclusions: Analysis of the perceptual map identified factors associated with breast cancer survivors' perceptions of breast appearance states that should be emphasized in the appearance consultation process. The perceptual map could be used to assist patients in visually expressing what they expect to look like. Our study lays the groundwork for evaluating interventions intended to help patients form realistic expectations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.