ReviewJournal of global health2025
The target trial framework in global health research: barriers and opportunities.
Review in Journal of global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative effectiveness of single-stage versus two-stage revision for hip prosthetic joint infection: emulation of the INFORM target trial using electronic health record data.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2026Observational
- Innovative design and modelling to improve sex and gender analysis in clinical trials.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A randomised trial is the best way to make causal inferences when evaluating the effectiveness and safety of health interventions in global health research. Trials, however, are inherently expensive, unfeasible in many scenarios, and may raise ethical issues. In these scenarios, we must turn to analyses of observational data to learn what works. The target trial framework provides an organising principle for the design of observational studies that can lead to clinically interpretable results and analytic approaches that can reduce common biases. In this analysis, we describe the global distribution of data sources used in applications of the target trial framework and discuss barriers to its increased use in global health research, such as limited access to high-quality observational data. We then suggest a cost-effective solution of incorporating the collection of additional high-quality observational data into the implementation of large randomised trials in low- and middle-income countries. We found that the target trial framework is underutilised in observational studies conducted in most low- and middle-income countries. The main barriers are little available data and few trained researchers, which can be overcome by incorporating high-quality observational data collection into the data collection phase of large randomised trials, and by introducing small adjustments to the teaching curriculum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.