ReviewZhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer2025
[Chinese Expert Consensus on Assessment and Clinical Application of Tertiary Lymphoid Structure for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (2025 Version)].
Review in Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The formation and function of tertiary lymphoid structures.Biomarker research · 2026Review
- Tertiary lymphoid structures in renal cell carcinoma: from heterogeneity dissection to translational precision immunotherapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The tertiary lymphoid structure (TLS) plays a crucial role in the tumor microenvironment, influencing tumor development and progression. As an emerging biomarker for predicting the prognosis and treatment response in cancer patients, TLS has received increasing attention. However, there is currently a lack of standardized evaluation criteria for TLS, and significant differences exist in TLS across different tumor tissues. This poses challenges for the clinical application of this biomarker in translation. To meet the clinical diagnosis and treatment needs of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), this consensus focuses on the definition, clinical significance, testing components, and assessment methods of TLS in NSCLC. Combining relevant research and Chinese clinical practice, it provides standardized and normalized suggestions for the clinical assessment and application of TLS, so as to improve the understanding of TLS among clinicians and pathologists, and provide a reference basis for the clinical application of the detection of TLS in NSCLC. .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.