ArticleNucleic acids research2025
Post-replicative lesion processing limits DNA damage-induced mutagenesis.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rad51 determines pathway usage in post-replication repair.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Dynamic Assemblies in Genome Maintenance.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
- REV1 Loss Triggers a G2/M Cell-Cycle Arrest Through Dysregulation of Mitotic Regulators.Genes · 2025Article
- Overcoming natural replication barriers formed by DNA structures and the role of repositioning to the nuclear periphery.DNA repair · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
DNA lesions are a threat to genome stability. To cope with them during DNA replication, cells have evolved lesion bypass mechanisms: Translesion Synthesis (TLS), which allows the cell to insert a nucleotide directly opposite the lesion, with the risk of introducing a mutation, and error-free damage avoidance (DA), which uses homologous recombination to retrieve the genetic information from the sister chromatid. In this study, we investigate the timing of lesion bypass in yeast and its implications for the accuracy of the process. Our findings reveal that DNA polymerase η can bypass common, UV-induced cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers at the fork, immediately after encountering the blocking lesion. In contrast, TLS at (6-4) photoproducts and bulky G-AAF adducts, mediated by Rev1 and Pol ζ, takes place behind the fork, at post-replicative gaps that are generated downstream of the lesion after repriming. We show that in this latter situation, TLS competes with the DA pathway, thus reducing overall mutagenicity of damage bypass. Additionally, our study demonstrates that Exo1 nuclease influences the balance between TLS and DA by modulating the size of the post-replicative gaps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.