ArticleCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
Willingness to Implement Narrative Communication Interventions: Mixed Methods Study Among Breast Cancer Patients and Survivors at the University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Article in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PurposeGlobally, black women experience poorer breast cancer outcomes suggesting the need for effective health promotion approaches to increase perceived susceptibility and improve screening practices. Although narrative communication by patients or survivors is increasingly considered an effective approach for better breast cancer outcomes, there is limited information on its use in Nigeria. This study assessed the perception, willingness and generalized self-efficacy of breast cancer patients and survivors at the University College Hospital, Ibadan, to implement narrative communication interventions.Material and MethodsThis was a cross-sectional study, and a mixed-method convergent parallel design was utilized for data collection. Written informed consent was obtained from each study participant for in-depth interviews and a semi-structured questionnaire. Five patients were recruited for in-depth interviews and a semi-structured questionnaire was used to obtain data from 102 patients. Data were analysed using thematic analysis for qualitative data, and descriptive and inferential statistics for quantitative data.ResultsThe mean age of the respondents was 49.3 ± 10.2 years. There was a good perception (97.1%) towards narrative communication interventions. Ninety-eight percent were willing to implement narrative communication interventions and 79.4% had a high generalized self-efficacy. Respondents' educational attainment was significantly associated with the generalized self-efficacy to implement narrative communication intervention programs (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.