Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40114254›Full record

ArticleImplementation science communications2025

Barriers and facilitators to HPV vaccination in rural South Carolina pharmacies: a qualitative investigation.

Abby Davies, Sarah Beth Tucker, Macie Goodman, Heather M Brandt, Tessa J Hastings

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Abby DaviesDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Outcomes Sciences, University of South Carolina College of Pharmacy, 715 Sumter St, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA. daviesam@email.sc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-0756-8159
Sarah Beth TuckerDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Outcomes Sciences, University of South Carolina College of Pharmacy, 715 Sumter St, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.
Macie GoodmanDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Outcomes Sciences, University of South Carolina College of Pharmacy, 715 Sumter St, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.
Heather M BrandtSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Epidemiology & Cancer Control, MS 762, Room S3005, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Memphis, TN, 38105-3678, USA.
Tessa J HastingsDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Outcomes Sciences, University of South Carolina College of Pharmacy, 715 Sumter St, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAs many as 14 million people contract a new case of HPV each year in the United States, with over 37,000 HPV cancers diagnosed each year. However, HPV vaccination coverage varies greatly with disparities by population and region. In rural areas, HPV vaccination rates for adolescents are significantly lower (12%) than for teens living in urban areas while HPV cancer rates are higher comparatively. Pharmacy-based vaccination services reduce accessibility barriers, as approximately 90% of Americans live within five miles of a community pharmacy. Unfortunately, implementation of HPV vaccination in community pharmacy settings remains low. Therefore, the objective of this study was to identify perceived barriers and facilitators to HPV vaccination services among South Carolina pharmacists.

methodsQualitative interviews with community-based pharmacists practicing in rural South Carolina were conducted from August-December 2021. Community pharmacists practicing in areas with primary Rural-Urban Commuting Area (RUCA) codes of 4 and above were invited to participate in this study. Recruitment continued until point of saturation. Interviews were approximately 30 min in length and conducted using a semi-structured guide. Interview questions were open-ended and designed to elicit barriers and facilitators to administering the HPV vaccination in a pharmacy setting. All interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. Transcripts were deductively coded using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), using NVivo to manage and analyze data.

resultsTen pharmacists participated in the qualitative interviews. Fourteen CFIR constructs were identified during qualitative analysis and interpretation. Applying the CFIR rating rules, seven constructs were found to have a strong influence (+ 2 or -2). Constructs with a strong positive influence, and indicated as facilitators, included "patient needs and resources" and "cosmopolitanism", while constructs with a strong negative influence, and indicated as barriers, included "design quality and packaging", "cost", "available resources", "external policy and initiatives", and "innovation participants".

conclusionMultiple barriers and facilitators were identified as impacting HPV vaccination in rural South Carolina community pharmacies. Addressing these barriers may improve pharmacy-based HPV vaccination services, thereby improving access in rural communities. Findings from this study will be used to develop implementation strategies to increase administration of the HPV vaccine in pharmacy settings.

Indexed as

Community pharmacyHealth facilitiesHuman papillomavirusPreventionRuralVaccines

Identifiers

PMID40114254
PMCPMC11924591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.