ArticleBMC chemistry2025
Development of UV-Chemometric techniques for resolving the overlapped spectra of aspirin, caffeine and orphenadrine citrate in their combined pharmaceutical dosage form.
Article in BMC chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A UV-chemometric approach has been developed to analyze a ternary combination of aspirin, caffeine, and orphenadrine citrate without the need for previous separation. The method is easy, specific, accurate, and highly precise. The three medications were evaluated simultaneously utilizing CLS, PLS, and PCR, which were generated based on separate data sets that yielded superior findings. Regrettably, their accurate estimation could only be achieved using the PLS approach. In order to determine the prediction power of each chemometric approach, its validity has been tested using 8 synthetic mixes. The latent variable number varies across various models as the dataset changes. The comparison of various methodologies and the assessment of the predictive capacity of each set of data were done using the predicted residual error sum of squares (PRESS) and the root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP). The created approach was also used to statistically compare the performance of PLS in a dataset with zero absorption, as well as to compare the performance of the offered chemometric methods in various datasets. The environmental impact of the created approach was assessed to determine the overall ecological sustainability of the designed methodology. According to the new Blue Applicability Grade Index (BAGI) evaluation methodology, the suggested technique was also found to be practicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.