Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40114222›Full record

ArticleBioData mining2025

Automatic detection and extraction of key resources from tables in biomedical papers.

Ibrahim Burak Ozyurt, Anita Bandrowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioData mining, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ibrahim Burak OzyurtFDI Lab Dept of Neuroscience, UCSD, 9500 Gilman Drive M/C 0608, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0608, USA. iozyurt@health.ucsd.edu.
Anita BandrowskiFDI Lab Dept of Neuroscience, UCSD, 9500 Gilman Drive M/C 0608, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0608, USA.

Funding

From RRID to Resource Watch: A Knowledgebase of Biomedical Research ResourcesR24GM144308 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Anita ELZBIETA Bandrowski, Jeffrey S. Grethe · 2022 to 2026
$2.9M
Chan Zuckerberg Initiative DAF 2022-250218NIGMS NIH HHS R24 GM144308NIH HHS GM144308
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTables are useful information artifacts that allow easy detection of missing data and have been deployed by several publishers to improve the amount of information present for key resources and reagents such as antibodies, cell lines, and other tools that constitute the inputs to a study. STAR*Methods key resource tables have increased the "findability" of these key resources, improving transparency of the paper by warning authors (before publication) about any problems, such as key resources that cannot be uniquely identified or those that are known to be problematic, but they have not been commonly available outside of the Cell Press journal family. We believe that processing preprints and adding these 'resource table candidates' automatically will improve the availability of structured and linked information about research resources in a broader swath of the scientific literature. However, if the authors have already added a key resource table, that table must be detected, and each entity must be correctly identified and faithfully restructured into a standard format.

methodsWe introduce four end-to-end table extraction pipelines to extract and faithfully reconstruct key resource tables from biomedical papers in PDF format. The pipelines employ machine learning approaches for key resource table page identification, "Table Transformer" models for table detection, and table structure recognition. We also introduce a character-level generative pre-trained transformer (GPT) language model for scientific tables pre-trained on over 11 million scientific tables. We fine-tuned our table-specific language model with synthetic training data generated with a novel approach to alleviate row over-segmentation significantly improving key resource extraction performance.

resultsThe extraction of key resource tables in PDF files by the popular GROBID tool resulted in a Grid Table Similarity (GriTS) score of 0.12. All of our pipelines have outperformed GROBID by a large margin. Our best pipeline with table-specific language model-based row merger achieved a GriTS score of 0.90.

conclusionsOur pipelines allow the detection and extraction of key resources from tables with much higher accuracy, enabling the deployment of automated research resource extraction tools on BioRxiv to help authors correct unidentifiable key resources detected in their articles and improve the reproducibility of their findings. The code, table-specific language model, annotated training and evaluation data are publicly available.

Indexed as

BioinformaticsInformation extractionLanguage modelingNatural language processingScientific reproducibilityTable extraction

Identifiers

PMID40114222
PMCPMC11924859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.