ArticleBMC biology2025
Sex- and social context-dependent differences in mice fine head movement during social interactions.
Article in BMC biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sex- and social context-dependent differences in mice fine head movement during social interactions.BMC biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSocial decision-making is influenced by multiple factors such as age, sex, emotional state, and the individual's social environment. While various behavioural readouts have been commonly used to study social behaviour in rodents, the role of fine head movements during social interactions remains underexplored despite the presence of accelerometers in many electrophysiological recording systems.
resultsHere, we used head acceleration data to analyse head movement kinematics in adult male and female mice across several social discrimination tests in various time scales. Our findings demonstrate the complementary nature of two variables derived from the raw acceleration, namely overall static (OSHA) and dynamic (ODHA) head acceleration, as well as specific head angles (Pitch and Roll). Together, these variables provide a comprehensive, detailed analysis of head movement, which cannot be easily achieved by video analysis systems such as DeepLabCut. Overall, our results suggest that head movement patterns are significantly influenced by sex, stimulus preference, and social context. Specifically, ODHA exhibited strong sex dependence and appeared to be more sensitive to internal states such as arousal and alertness. The static components were primarily influenced by social context, particularly stimulus preference, and seemed to reflect the subject's motivation to engage with the stimulus. The Roll angle also appeared strongly modulated by the broader social context.
conclusionsOur study provides a novel method and analysis pipeline for studying the social behaviour of small rodents in high-time resolution using a head-based accelerometer. Our findings suggest that such measurements may inform the affective and motivational states of the subject during social interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.