ArticleBMC medical education2025
Bridging the gaps in problem-based learning: an evidence-based intervention in bachelor of medicine and surgery (MBBS) program.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Teaching at scale: a mixed-methods study of team-based learning analytics to enable early support in medical education.BMC medical education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionProblem-based learning (PBL) is one of medical education's most effective student-centered learning modalities. However, a lack of experience has led to several gaps in this useful learning modality, prohibiting it from achieving the desired goals. This study aimed to find gaps in our institution's PBL strategy, take measures to fill these gaps, and then assess the effect of these measures.
methodsThis interventional study was conducted in a Bachelor of Medicine and Surgery (MBBS) program after receiving ethical approval. The study consisted of three phases: gap identification, intervention, and evaluation. Faculty and student training sessions were conducted to provide insight into PBL processes, followed by a Quality Assessment Questionnaire (QAQ) to assess PBL design and delivery gaps. A PBL revision committee then used the 3C3R model to redesign 136 PBLs, improving alignment with learning outcomes. Pre- and post-intervention scores from the QAQ and formative assessments were analyzed using Wilcoxon signed-rank and paired t-tests.
resultsPre-intervention QAQ scores averaged 2.7 out of 5, reflecting issues PBL problems and conduction. Post-intervention scores improved to 4.0 (p <.001), indicating a 48.1% enhancement in perceived PBL quality. Post-PBL formative assessments showed significant score improvements across blocks, with an overall effect size (Cohen's d) of -0.54. Student and faculty satisfaction ratings also increased, averaging 4.3 and 4.8, respectively.
conclusionDue to practical novelty, PBL may have certain gaps and deficiencies that must be removed by targeted interventions to achieve the desired outcomes of this state-of-the-art learning strategy. TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.