ArticleJournal of biomedical semantics2025
New and revised gene ontology biological process terms describe multiorganism interactions critical for understanding microbial pathogenesis and sequences of concern.
Article in Journal of biomedical semantics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Gene Ontology knowledgebase in 2026.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Beyond sequence similarity: toward function-based screening of nucleic acid synthesis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- ADAPT: a programme for the advanced detection of AI-enabled pathogenic threats.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere is a new framework from the United States government for screening synthetic nucleic acids. Beginning in October of 2026, it calls for the screening of sequences 50 nucleotides or greater in length that are known to contribute to pathogenicity or toxicity for humans, regardless of the taxa from which it originates. Distinguishing sequences that encode pathogenic and toxic functions from those that lack them is not simple.
objectivesOur project scope was to discern, describe, and catalog sequences involved in microbial pathogenesis from the scientific literature. We recognize a need for better terminology to designate pathogenic functions that are relevant across the entire range of existing parasites.
methodsWe canvassed publications investigating microbial pathogens of humans, other animals, and some plants to collect thousands of sequences that enable the exploitation of hosts. We compared sequences to each other, grouping them according to what host biological processes they subvert and the consequence(s) for the host. We developed terms to capture many of the varied pathogenic functions for sequences employed by parasitic microbes for host exploitation and applied these terms in a systematic manner to our dataset of sequences. RESULTS/
conclusionsThe enhanced and expanded terms enable a quick and pertinent evaluation of a sequence's ability to endow a microbe with pathogenic function when they are appropriately applied to relevant sequences. This will allow providers of synthetic nucleic acids to rapidly assess sequences ordered by their customers for pathogenic capacity. This will help fulfill the new US government guidance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.