Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40114174›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2025

Ethical dilemmas and decision-making in emergency and critical care nursing in Western Amhara region, Northwest Ethiopia: a multi-method qualitative study.

Abebe Dilie Afenigus, Mastewal Ayehu Sinshaw

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Abebe Dilie AfenigusDepartment of Nursing, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Debre Markos University, PO Box 269, Debre Markos, Gojjam, Ethiopia. abexdmu@gmail.com.
Mastewal Ayehu SinshawTibebe Ghion Specialized Hospital, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Gojjam, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEthical dilemmas in emergency and critical care nursing often involve complex decision-making that impacts patient outcomes, emotional well-being of healthcare providers, and team dynamics. Understanding these dilemmas and the decision-making processes involved is crucial for improving nursing practices and patient outcomes in this context.

objectiveThis study aims to explore the ethical dilemmas and decision-making processes of emergency and critical care nurses, using the Four Box. Method ethical decision-making framework.

methodsA multi-method qualitative approach was employed, incorporating in-depth individual interviews (IDI), focus group discussions (FGD), and case studies to capture diverse perspectives. Data were collected from 28 nurses working in emergency and critical care settings at Tibebe Ghion Specialized Hospital and Felege Hiwot Comprehensive Specialized Hospital through purposive sampling. The interviews and focus groups were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim in Amharic, translated into English, and entered into OpenCode software for analysis. Inductive thematic analysis method was applied to analyze the data.

resultsThe study revealed several key ethical dilemmas faced by nurses, including balancing patient autonomy with beneficence, and the allocation of limited resources during crises, opioid administration for pain management vs. respiratory depression, and conflicts regarding informed consent. Nurses reported emotional and professional impacts from these dilemmas, contributing to moral distress, burnout, and ethical fatigue. Nurses emphasized the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration and structured decision-making frameworks to navigate these challenges. However, the lack of consistent access to ethics consultations and peer support during critical moments was noted as a significant barrier. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: Nurses encounter complex ethical dilemmas that impact their emotional well-being and job satisfaction. Effective decision-making requires applying ethical principles, adhering to guidelines, and consulting peers. The study reveals the need for improved support systems, including more frequent and comprehensive ethics training, better access to ethics consultations, and structured frameworks to guide decision-making in high-pressure situations. CLINICAL

trial registrationThe study is not a clinical trial, a clinical trial number is not applicable.

Indexed as

Decision makingEmergency and critical careEthical dilemmaNursing

Identifiers

PMID40114174
PMCPMC11924746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.