Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40114169›Full record

Trial reportGenome medicine2025

Whole genome sequencing of 378 prostate cancer metastases reveals tissue selectivity for mismatch deficiency with potential therapeutic implications.

Daniel J Vis, Sander A L Palit, Marie Corradi, Edwin Cuppen, Niven Mehra, Martijn P Lolkema, Lodewyk F A Wessels, Michiel S van der Heijden, Wilbert Zwart, Andries M Bergman

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Genome medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01855477 (Development of a Platform for Next-generation DNA Sequencing Based Personalized Treatment for Cancer Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01855477 nacompletednot on this map

Development of a Platform for Next-generation DNA Sequencing Based Personalized Treatment for Cancer Patients: Protocol to Obtain Biopsies From Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Cancer (CPCT - 02 Biopsy Protocol)

TypeinterventionalSponsorFoundation CPCTRan2011 to 2023Enrolled6,927ConditionsSolid Tumors, Metastatic DiseaseArmsHistological biopsy procedure
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Daniel J VisDivision of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sander A L PalitDivision of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marie CorradiDivision of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Edwin CuppenCenter for Molecular Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Niven MehraDepartment of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Martijn P LolkemaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Lodewyk F A WesselsDivision of Computational Cancer Biology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Michiel S van der HeijdenDivision of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. ms.vd.heijden@nki.nl.
Wilbert ZwartOncode Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands. w.zwart@nki.nl.
Andries M BergmanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. a.bergman@nki.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurvival of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) depends on the site of metastatic dissemination.

methodsPatients with mCRPC were prospectively included in the CPCT-02 metastatic site biopsy study. We evaluated whole genome sequencing (WGS) of 378 mCRPC metastases to understand the genetic traits that affect metastatic site distribution.

resultsOur findings revealed that RB1, PIK3CA, JAK1, RNF43, and TP53 mutations are the most frequent genetic determinants associated with site selectivity for metastatic outgrowth. Furthermore, we explored mutations in the non-coding genome and found that androgen receptor (AR) chromatin binding sites implicated in metastatic prostate cancer differ in mutation frequencies between metastatic sites, converging on pathways that impact DNA repair. Notably, liver and visceral metastases have a higher tumor mutational load (TML) than bone and lymph node metastases, independent of genetic traits associated with neuroendocrine differentiation. We found that TML is strongly associated with DNA mismatch repair (MMR)-deficiency features in these organs.

conclusionsOur results revealed gene mutations that are significantly associated with metastatic site selectivity and that frequencies of non-coding mutations at AR chromatin binding sites differ between metastatic sites. Immunotherapeutics are thus far unsuccessful in unselected mCRPC patients. We found a higher TML in liver and visceral metastases compared to bone and lymph node metastases. As immunotherapeutics response is associated with mutational burden, these findings may assist in selecting mCRPC patients for immunotherapy treatment based on organs affected by metastatic disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01855477.

Indexed as

DNA Mismatch RepairProstatic Neoplasms, Castration-ResistantWhole Genome SequencingAgedHumansMaleMiddle AgedMutationNeoplasm MetastasisOrgan SpecificityReceptors, AndrogenReceptors, AndrogenCoding DNAImmunotherapeuticsMetastasesMutationsNon-coding DNAProstate cancerSite selectivityTumor mutational load

Identifiers

PMID40114169
PMCPMC11927350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.