Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40114167›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2025

How does learning happen in field epidemiology training programmes? A qualitative study.

Matthew Myers Griffith, Emma Field, Angela Song-En Huang, Tomoe Shimada, Munkhzul Battsend, Tambri Housen, Barbara Pamphilon, Martyn David Kirk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Matthew Myers GriffithNational Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia. matthew.griffith@anu.edu.au.
Emma FieldNational Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Angela Song-En HuangTaiwan Field Epidemiology Training Program, Centers for Disease Control, Taipei, Taiwan.
Tomoe ShimadaField Epidemiology Training Program of Japan, Center for Field Epidemic Intelligence, Research and Professional Development, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Munkhzul BattsendMongolian Field Epidemiology Training Programme, National Center for Communicable Diseases, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia.
Tambri HousenSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.
Barbara PamphilonFaculty of Education, University of Canberra, Bruce, Australia.
Martyn David KirkNational Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite a 75-year history of building epidemiologic capacity and strengthening public health systems, the learning processes in field epidemiology training programmes (FETPs) remain unexamined.

methodsWe codesigned a grounded theory and narrative inquiry qualitative study to fill this gap. The study aimed to understand the learning processes in four FETPs by describing training approaches for field epidemiologists, outlining learning strategies among trainees, and examining principles and practices that align training approaches and learning strategies. Data collection included participant observations and semi-structured interviews with FETP trainees and advisors within programmes in Australia, Japan, Mongolia, and Taiwan.

resultsAnalysis revealed that learning occurs as trainees engage in real-world public health contexts, interacting with their people, systems, data, and knowledge. Facilitators of the learning process were learning environments (projects, routine placement work, field investigations, and courses), advisor stewardship, and trainee tenacity.

conclusionsOur findings align with established and contemporary learning theories and suggest that all countries have the tools to build field epidemiology capacity and leadership. To refine these tools, governments, partners, and programme leaders should ensure access to learning environments, fortify advisor stewardship, and foster a culture of resilience among trainees. FETP is among the strongest levers to bolster the workforce for global health security before the next pandemic, and these findings reveal pathways toward better investments.

Indexed as

EpidemiologyLearningPublic HealthAustraliaGrounded TheoryHumansInterviews as TopicQualitative ResearchTaiwanAdult learningEpidemiologic capacity buildingField epidemiology training programmesHealth securityPublic health trainingPublic health workforce development

Identifiers

PMID40114167
PMCPMC11927242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.