Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40114165›Full record

ArticleReproductive health2025

Implementation, effectiveness, and barriers of obstetric triage in reducing waiting time: a scoping review.

Zemenu Yohannes Kassa, Abel F Dadi, Habtamu Mellie Bizuayehu, Subash Thapa, Getiye Dejenu Kibret, Tahir A Hassen, Abdulbasit Seid, Daniel Bekele Ketema, Meless G Bore, Teketo Kassaw Tegegne and 5 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Zemenu Yohannes KassaRural Health Research Institute, Charles Sturt University, Orange, NSW, Australia. zemenu2013@gmail.com.
Abel F DadiMenzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina, NT, Australia.
Habtamu Mellie BizuayehuFirst Nations Cancer and Wellbeing (FNCW) Research Program, School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, QLD, Brisbane, Australia.
Subash ThapaRural Health Research Institute, Charles Sturt University, Orange, NSW, Australia.
Getiye Dejenu KibretCentre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Tahir A HassenCenter for Women's Health Research, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
Abdulbasit SeidSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Daniel Bekele KetemaSchool of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Science, Debre Markos University, Debre Markos, Ethiopia.
Meless G BoreCollege of Medicine and Health Sciences, Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia.
Teketo Kassaw TegegneInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Daniel Bogale OdoNational Centre for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Wellbeing Research, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Erkihun AmsaluSydney Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Sewunet Admasu BelachewFirst Nations Cancer and Wellbeing (FNCW) Research Program, School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, QLD, Brisbane, Australia.
Desalegn Markos ShiftiFirst Nations Cancer and Wellbeing (FNCW) Research Program, School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Kedir Y AhmedRural Health Research Institute, Charles Sturt University, Orange, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe assessment of a pregnant woman typically begins at obstetric triage, where healthcare providers evaluate whether life-altering decisions are necessary for the woman and her unborn baby. This scoping review aimed to assess the lack of comprehensive evaluation of across diverse settings of the evidence on the effectiveness, implementation, and barriers to the successful implementation of obstetric triage during pregnancy and childbirth.

methodsThe Arksey and O'Malley scoping review methodological framework and Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers' Manual were applied to conduct the scoping review. The Population, Concept, and Context strategy (PCC) was used to develop the review questions, eligibility criteria, and research strategy, incorporating findings from both quantitative and qualitative research. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses: Extension for Scoping review (PRISMA-ScR) was implemented. A scoping review search was conducted using four databases by specific key words for example: "pregnant woman" OR "postnatal woman" AND "triage" OR "obstetric emergency service" OR "health facility" AND "delivery" OR "childbirth" OR "obstetric" OR "prenatal care" OR "parturition" OR "pregnancy" OR "maternal health services" OR "perinatal care" OR "postnatal care". Further additional studies or references were culled from included primary studies to identify relevant studies that were missed in the initial search.

resultsThe search strategy generated an initial list of 622 studies of which 15 studies were included. The findings revealed that the implementation of obstetric triage can substantially reduce delays in getting care (delay 3) during birth. The barriers within the department which hindered the successful implementation of obstetric triage included shortages of staff and space, burnout and fatigue among health professionals, inadequate knowledge, resistance to change, lack of commitment and responsibility, unclear task descriptions, insufficient supplies, and deficient communications system.

conclusionOur findings underscore that the effective implementation of triage was linked to reduced costs, such as decreased waiting times for women, across six countries. However, identified factors frequently hampered the successful implementation of obstetric triage during pregnancy and childbirth. Given that implementing obstetric triage can substantially reduce delays in getting care during pregnancy and childbirth, linked to reducing costs, and the identified barriers need to be addressed.

Indexed as

Delivery, ObstetricMaternal Health ServicesTriageWaiting ListsFemaleHumansPregnancyChildbirthObstetric triagePregnancy

Identifiers

PMID40114165
PMCPMC11927293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.