ArticleBMC biology2025
CTCF-anchored chromatin loop dynamics during human meiosis.
Article in BMC biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDuring meiosis, the mammalian genome is organised within chromatin loops, which facilitate synapsis, crossing over and chromosome segregation, setting the stage for recombination events and the generation of genetic diversity. Chromatin looping is thought to play a major role in the establishment of cross overs during prophase I of meiosis, in diploid early primary spermatocytes. However, chromatin conformation dynamics during human meiosis are difficult to study experimentally, due to the transience of each cell division and the difficulty of obtaining stage-resolved cell populations. Here, we employed a machine learning framework trained on single cell ATAC-seq and RNA-seq data to predict CTCF-anchored looping during spermatogenesis, including cell types at different stages of meiosis.
resultsWe find dramatic changes in genome-wide looping patterns throughout meiosis: compared to pre-and-post meiotic germline cell types, loops in meiotic early primary spermatocytes are more abundant, more variable between individual cells, and more evenly spread throughout the genome. In preparation for the first meiotic division, loops also include longer stretches of DNA, encompassing more than half of the total genome. These loop structures then influence the rate of recombination initiation and resolution as cross overs. In contrast, in later mature sperm stages, we find evidence of genome compaction, with loops being confined to the telomeric ends of the chromosomes.
conclusionOverall, we find that chromatin loops do not orchestrate the gene expression dynamics seen during spermatogenesis, but loops do play important roles in recombination, influencing the positions of DNA breakage and cross over events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.