Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40114140›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2025

Development of PDAC diagnosis and prognosis evaluation models based on machine learning.

Yingqi Xiao, Shixin Sun, Naxin Zheng, Jing Zhao, Xiaohan Li, Jianmin Xu, Haolian Li, Chenran Du, Lijun Zeng, Juling Zhang and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Yingqi XiaoDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Beijing Electric Power Teaching Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Shixin SunDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, The Fifth Medical Centre of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Naxin ZhengDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, The Fifth Medical Centre of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jing ZhaoDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, The Fifth Medical Centre of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xiaohan LiDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, The Fifth Medical Centre of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jianmin XuDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, The Fifth Medical Centre of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Haolian LiDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, The Fifth Medical Centre of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Chenran DuDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, The Fifth Medical Centre of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Lijun ZengDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, The Fifth Medical Centre of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Juling ZhangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, The Fifth Medical Centre of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xiuyun YinDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, The Fifth Medical Centre of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yuan HuangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, The Fifth Medical Centre of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xuemei YangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, The Fifth Medical Centre of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Fang YuanDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, The Fifth Medical Centre of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xingwang JiaDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Beijing Electric Power Teaching Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. jiaxingw301@163.com.
Boan LiDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, The Fifth Medical Centre of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China. lba@263.net.
Bo LiDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, The Fifth Medical Centre of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China. pipi780816@aliyun.com.

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality L244032the Capital's Funds for Health Improvement and Research SF2024-1-2171
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is difficult to detect early and highly aggressive, often leading to poor patient prognosis. Existing serum biomarkers like CA19-9 are limited in early diagnosis, failing to meet clinical needs. Machine learning (ML)/deep learning (DL) technologies have shown great potential in biomedicine. This study aims to establish PDAC differential diagnosis and prognosis assessment models using ML combined with serum biomarkers for early diagnosis, risk stratification, and personalized treatment recommendations, improving early diagnosis rates and patient survival.

methodsThe study included serum biomarker data and prognosis information from 117 PDAC patients. ML models (Random Forest (RF), Neural Network (NNET), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM)) were used for differential diagnosis, evaluated by accuracy, Kappa test, ROC curve, sensitivity, and specificity. COX proportional hazards model and DeepSurv DL model predicted survival risk, compared by C-index and Log-rank test. Based on DeepSurv's risk predictions, personalized treatment recommendations were made and their effectiveness assessed.

resultsEffective PDAC diagnosis and prognosis models were built using ML. The validation set data shows that the accuracy of the RF, NNET, SVM, and GBM models are 84.21%, 84.21%, 76.97%, and 83.55%; the sensitivity are 91.26%, 90.29%, 89.32%, and 88.35%; and the specificity are 69.39%, 71.43%, 51.02%, and 73.47%. The Kappa values are 0.6266, 0.6307, 0.4336, and 0.6215; and the AUC are 0.889, 0.8488, 0.8488, and 0.8704, respectively. BCAT1, AMY, and CA12-5 were selected as modeling parameters for the prognosis model using COX regression. DeepSurv outperformed the COX model on both training and validation sets, with C-indexes of 0.738 and 0.724, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier survival curves indicate that personalized treatment recommendations based on DeepSurv can help patients achieve survival benefits.

conclusionThis study built efficient PDAC diagnosis and prognosis models using ML, improving early diagnosis rates and prognosis accuracy. The DeepSurv model excelled in prognosis prediction and successfully guided personalized treatment recommendations and supporting PDAC clinical management.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalMachine LearningPancreatic NeoplasmsAgedDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeural Networks, ComputerPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsROC CurveSupport Vector MachineBiomarkers, TumorDeepSurvIndividualized treatment recommendationMachine learningPancreatic ductal adenocarcinomaPrognosis prediction

Identifiers

PMID40114140
PMCPMC11924714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.