ArticleBMC cancer2025
Development of PDAC diagnosis and prognosis evaluation models based on machine learning.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Progress and current trends in prediction models for the occurrence and prognosis of cancer and cancer-related complications: a bibliometric and visualization analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence for the Diagnosis and Management of Cancers: Potentials and Challenges.MedComm · 2025Review
- Differential diagnosis of eczema and psoriasis using routine clinical data and machine learning: development of a web-based tool in a multicenter outpatient cohort.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- The place of advanced machine learning techniques in building pancreatic adenocarcinoma survival and recurrence prognosis models.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence-assisted noninvasive preoperative prediction of lymph nodes metastasis in cervical cancer through a clinical-imaging feature combined strategy.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is difficult to detect early and highly aggressive, often leading to poor patient prognosis. Existing serum biomarkers like CA19-9 are limited in early diagnosis, failing to meet clinical needs. Machine learning (ML)/deep learning (DL) technologies have shown great potential in biomedicine. This study aims to establish PDAC differential diagnosis and prognosis assessment models using ML combined with serum biomarkers for early diagnosis, risk stratification, and personalized treatment recommendations, improving early diagnosis rates and patient survival.
methodsThe study included serum biomarker data and prognosis information from 117 PDAC patients. ML models (Random Forest (RF), Neural Network (NNET), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM)) were used for differential diagnosis, evaluated by accuracy, Kappa test, ROC curve, sensitivity, and specificity. COX proportional hazards model and DeepSurv DL model predicted survival risk, compared by C-index and Log-rank test. Based on DeepSurv's risk predictions, personalized treatment recommendations were made and their effectiveness assessed.
resultsEffective PDAC diagnosis and prognosis models were built using ML. The validation set data shows that the accuracy of the RF, NNET, SVM, and GBM models are 84.21%, 84.21%, 76.97%, and 83.55%; the sensitivity are 91.26%, 90.29%, 89.32%, and 88.35%; and the specificity are 69.39%, 71.43%, 51.02%, and 73.47%. The Kappa values are 0.6266, 0.6307, 0.4336, and 0.6215; and the AUC are 0.889, 0.8488, 0.8488, and 0.8704, respectively. BCAT1, AMY, and CA12-5 were selected as modeling parameters for the prognosis model using COX regression. DeepSurv outperformed the COX model on both training and validation sets, with C-indexes of 0.738 and 0.724, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier survival curves indicate that personalized treatment recommendations based on DeepSurv can help patients achieve survival benefits.
conclusionThis study built efficient PDAC diagnosis and prognosis models using ML, improving early diagnosis rates and prognosis accuracy. The DeepSurv model excelled in prognosis prediction and successfully guided personalized treatment recommendations and supporting PDAC clinical management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.