Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40114125›Full record

SynthesisBMC oral health2025

Influence of alloplastic materials, biologics, and their combinations, along with defect characteristics, on short-term intrabony defect surgical treatment outcomes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Khanti Rattanpornsompong, Kantapon Rattanaprukskul, Sikharate Prachanukoon, Kanokrat Sriwangyang, Mawika Rinkrathok, Junji Tagami, Thantrira Porntaveetus

Abstract readSystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Khanti RattanpornsompongCenter of Excellence in Genomics and Precision Dentistry, Department of Physiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Kantapon RattanaprukskulDepartment of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Sikharate PrachanukoonCenter of Excellence in Genomics and Precision Dentistry, Department of Physiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Kanokrat SriwangyangCenter of Excellence in Genomics and Precision Dentistry, Department of Physiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Mawika RinkrathokCenter of Excellence in Genomics and Precision Dentistry, Department of Physiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Junji TagamiFaculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand. tagami.ope@tmd.ac.jp.
Thantrira PorntaveetusCenter of Excellence in Genomics and Precision Dentistry, Department of Physiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand. thantrira.p@chula.ac.th.

Funding

Health Systems Research Institute (66-101)National Research Council of Thailand (N42A650229)Thailand Science Research and Innovation Fund Chulalongkorn University, and Faculty of Dentistry (DRF68_007)The Ratchadapisek Sompoch Endowment Fund (2023), Chulalongkorn University (Meta_66_005_3200_002)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTreating periodontal intrabony defects remains challenging, alloplast materials and biologics are increasingly utilized to improve regeneration outcomes. However, comparative efficacy on alloplast materials remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of alloplastic materials, both alone and combined with biologics, in treating periodontal defects.

methodsA systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and CENTRAL identified 74 eligible randomized controlled trials. Meta-analysis assessed data heterogeneity based on defect depth and morphology, classifying defects by wall configuration. Network meta-analysis compared clinical attachment level (CAL) gain, probing depth (PD) reduction, and radiographic linear bone (RLB) gain up to 12 months. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool, and confidence in network meta-analysis was graded using CINeMA.

resultsDefect depth and morphology significantly impacted heterogeneity outcomes at 6 months, but by 12 months, differences across treatments were less significant. Biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) and nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite (nHA) showed notable improvements in CAL gain, PD reduction, and RLB gain. Combining nHA with platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) outperformed open flap debridement (mean differences at 6 months for CAL gain: 1.37 mm, PD reduction: 1.52 mm and RLB gain: 1.39 mm). SUCRA ranked bioglass and BCP highest for single treatments, while bioglass with platelet-rich plasma and nHA + PRF excelled among combinations.

conclusionsAlloplastic materials, particularly BCP and nHA, significantly enhance periodontal treatment outcomes, especially when combined with biologics like PRF. Defect depth and morphology influence treatment efficacy at 6 months, though by 12 months, treatment outcomes converge, underscoring the value of early, tailored strategies in periodontal therapy.

trial registrationNot applicable.

Indexed as

Alveolar Bone LossBiocompatible MaterialsBiological ProductsBone SubstitutesHumansHydroxyapatitesTreatment OutcomeBiocompatible MaterialsBiological ProductsBone SubstitutesHydroxyapatitesBioglassBiologicsBiphasic calcium phosphateDefect depthDefect morphologyIntrabony defectsNanocrystalline hydroxyapatite

Identifiers

PMID40114125
PMCPMC11927257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.