ArticleBMC health services research2025
Integrated specialty care for amyloidosis: a scoping review using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAmyloidosis is a complex and rare disease requiring specialized, multidisciplinary care to effectively manage its diverse manifestations. Existing evidence underscores the benefits of such care, linked to improved patient outcomes and clinician satisfaction. With the rising incidence of amyloidosis diagnoses and rapid advancements in treatment, the need for coordinated, expert-led care is increasing. However, implementing these centers is challenging due to resource allocation and inter-specialty collaboration. While resource allocation is a known hurdle, there has not been a comprehensive review of all the barriers and facilitators to establishing these clinics. This scoping review aims to identify the barriers and facilitators related to the implementation of coordinated, multidisciplinary specialty care clinics in amyloidosis management.
methodsAn electronic search was conducted in Medline, Embase, and CINAHL for studies published in English from 2013 to 2023, supplemented by a grey literature search. The inclusion criteria focused on studies discussing multidisciplinary clinical environments for amyloidosis care, particularly light-chain (AL) and transthyretin amyloidosis (TTR). Exclusion criteria included books, opinion pieces, dissertations, and conference abstracts. Data were analyzed and synthesized using a narrative synthesis approach, guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), and reported according to PRISMA-ScR guidelines.
resultsThe search resulted in 1547 findings. After screening with Covidence, 7 papers were included in the final review. Independent reviewers screened and extracted the papers. Key facilitators identified include access to experts, adequate staffing, secure funding, partnerships with patient advocacy groups, and robust processes for multidisciplinary communication. Barriers primarily relate to the complexity of care, a lack of standardized protocols, difficulties in communication and coordination between providers, and challenges in training and maintaining knowledgeable care providers. The review also revealed significant gaps in existing research.
conclusionsThis review enhances understanding of the barriers and facilitators in establishing amyloidosis specialty clinics. Addressing these barriers and leveraging facilitators are crucial for shaping the future of amyloidosis care. These insights support a model for implementing integrated care for this growing patient population and highlight the need for further research to support policy development and effective implementation of these specialized clinics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.