ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
A machine learning model based on placental magnetic resonance imaging and clinical factors to predict fetal growth restriction.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early detection of severe fetal growth restriction using multimodal deep learning based on ultrasound and prenatal biomarkers.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Prediction and Diagnosis of Fetal Growth Restriction: A Systematic Review.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2026Review
- From Adaptive Resilience to Catastrophic Systems Collapse: Endothelial Entropy, Ferroptotic Propagation, and the Maternal Point of No Return in Emergency Peripartum Hysterectomy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- A multi-task deep learning and radiomics framework for fetal anatomical structure detection and classification in ultrasound imaging.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo create a placental radiomics-clinical machine learning model to predict FGR. MATERIALS AND
methodsRetrospectively analyzed placental MRI and clinical data of 110 FGR cases and 158 healthy controls at 28-37 weeks of gestation from two campuses of ZWH. 227 cases from Hubin campus were randomly divided into training (n = 182) and internal testing set (n = 45). 41 cases from Xiaoshan campus were included in external testing set. Placental MRI features were extracted from sagittal T2WI. Mann-Whitney U test, redundancy analysis, and LASSO were used to identify the radiomics signature, and the best-performing radiomics model was constructed by comparing eight machine learning algorithms. Clinical factors determined by univariate and multivariate analyses. A united model and nomogram combining the radiomics Rad-score and clinical factors were established. The performance of the models was assessed by DeLong test, calibration curve and decision curve analysis.
resultsOf 1561 radiomics features, 10 strongly correlated with FGR were selected. The radiomics model using logistic regression performed best compared eight algorithms. 5 important clinical features identified by analysis. The united model demonstrated a good predictive performance in the training, internal testing and external testing sets, with AUC 0.941 (95% CI, 0.0.904-0.977), 0.899 (95% CI, 0.789-1) and 0.861 (95% CI 0.725-0.998), prediction accuracies 0.885, 0.844 and 0.805, precisions 0.871, 0.789 and 0.867, recalls 0.836, 0.833 and 0.684, and F1 scores 0.853, 0.811 and 0.765, respectively. The calibration and decision curves of the united model also showed good performance. Nomogram confirmed clinical applicability of the model.
conclusionsThe proposed placental radiomics-clinical machine learning model is simple yet effective to predict FGR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.