Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40114076›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2025

Trends in national and ethnic burden of ovarian cancer mortality in South Africa (1999-2018): a population based, age-period-cohort and join point regression analyses.

Gbenga Olorunfemi, Elena Libhaber, Oliver C Ezechi, Eustasius Musenge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gbenga OlorunfemiDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Witwatersrand, Parktown, Johannesburg, South Africa. drgbengafemi@yahoo.co.uk.
Elena LibhaberFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Oliver C EzechiDivision of Clinical Sciences, Nigerian Institute for Medical Research, Lagos, Nigeria.
Eustasius MusengeDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Witwatersrand, Parktown, Johannesburg, South Africa.

Funding

GSK Africa Non-Communicable Disease Open Lab through the DELTAS Africa Sub-Saharan African Consortium for Advanced Biostatistics (SSACAB) training programme D1702270-01Science for Africa Foundation to the Developing Excellence in Leadership, Training and Science in Africa (DELTAS Africa SSACAB II) programme DEL-22-009Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ovarian cancer is the most lethal and third leading cause of gynaecological cancers globally and in South Africa (SA). However, its current mortality trends have not been evaluated in most sub-Saharan African Countries including South Africa that is currently undergoing epidemiological and health transitions. We evaluate the trends in the ovarian cancer mortality rates in SA over 20 years (1999-2018).

methodsCrude (CMR) and age standardised mortality rates (ASMR) of ovarian cancer was calculated based on national mortality data of South Africa. The overall and ethnic trends of ovarian cancer mortality among women aged 15 years and older from 1999 to 2018 was assessed using the Join point regression model, while Age-period-cohort regression analysis was conducted to evaluate the underlying impact of age, period and cohort on ovarian cancer mortality.

resultsIn all, 12,721 ovarian cancer deaths were reported in South Africa from 1999 to 2018 and the mortality rates increased from 2.34 to 3.21 per 100,00 women at 1.8% per annum. In 2018, the overall mean age at ovarian cancer death in South Africa was 62.30 ± 14.96 years while the mean age at death among Black women (58.07 ± 15.56 years), was about 11 years earlier than among White women (69.48 ± 11.71 years). In 2018, the White ethnic group (4.93 deaths per 100,000 women) had about doubled the ovarian cancer ASMR for the non-Whites (Indian/Asians, 2.92/100,000 women, mixed race, 2.49/100,000 women and Black women (2.36/ 100,000 women). All the ethnic groups had increased ASMR with Black women (Average annual percent change, [AAPC]: 4.7%, P-value < 0.001) and Indian/Asian women (AAPC: 2.5%, P-value < 0.001) having the highest rise. Cohort mortality risk ratio of ovarian cancer increased with successive birth cohort from 0.35 among 1924-1928 birth cohorts to 3.04 among 1999-2003 cohort and the period mortality risk increased by about 13% and 7.5% from 1999 to 2003 to 2004-2008 (RR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.80-0.94), and from 2004 to 2008 to 2009-2013 (RR: 1.075, 95% CI:1.004-1.152) respectively. The longitudinal age analysis revealed that ovarian cancer increased with age, but there was an exponential increase from 55 years.

conclusionsOur study showed that there was increasing trends in ovarian cancer mortality among all the South African ethnic groups, driven partly by increasing cohort and period mortality risks. We therefore highlight the huge burden of ovarian cancer in SA and the need for targeted intervention. Public health interventions geared towards reducing ovarian cancer mortality should be instituted and ethnic disparity should be incorporated in the cancer control policy.

Indexed as

Ovarian NeoplasmsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsCohort StudiesEthnicityFemaleHumansMiddle AgedMortalityRegression AnalysisSouth AfricaYoung AdultAge period cohort analysisAPC analysisEthnic disparity of cancerGynaecological cancer trendsJoin point regressionOvarian cancer mortalitySouth AfricaSub-saharan Africa

Identifiers

PMID40114076
PMCPMC11927304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.