ArticleBMC primary care2025
The role of a specialized memory clinic supporting primary care providers in a safety net health system.
Article in BMC primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlthough most dementia care occurs in primary care, consultation with dementia specialty care is sometimes indicated. Access to dementia specialists is limited, particularly in resource-limited environments such as the public health safety net, which may require triaging referrals to preserve access for patients with needs that can not be met in a primary care setting.
methodsThe eConsult system for primary care providers to refer patients to a subspecialty memory clinic is described for a large safety net health system. Demographic and clinical characteristics are presented for patients evaluated within the memory clinic setting compared to the health system overall. ICD-10-CM codes were used to identify cognitive diagnoses and medical comorbidities. Chi-squared tests were used to compare categorical variables and t-tests for continuous variables.
results94 individuals age 50 or older were seen in the memory clinic in 2019, of whom 43 were new evaluations. The most common visit diagnoses for new memory clinic patients were Alzheimer's disease (33%), no cognitive diagnosis (28%), unspecified dementia (19%), and mild cognitive impairment (12%); for follow up patients, the most common diagnoses were Alzheimer's disease (49%), unspecified dementia (18%), no cognitive diagnosis (14%), and mild cognitive impairment (10%). For those without a cognitive diagnosis, common visit diagnoses included cognitive symptoms, mood or sleep disorders, and metabolic disturbances. Of the 11 new internal referrals with a prior coded diagnosis of dementia, median time from first diagnosis to their initial memory clinic visit was 224 days.
conclusionsDespite clear systemwide parameters for referral and extensive pre-referral screening via an eConsult system, the most common diagnosis for memory clinic patients was Alzheimer's disease. Direct studies of eConsult are needed to determine primary care providers' needs when referring patients with dementia to a memory clinic setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.