ArticleBMC gastroenterology2025
Assessing the consistency of FIB-4, APRI, and GPR in evaluating significant liver fibrosis and cirrhosis in COVID-19 patients with concurrent liver diseases.
Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between steatotic liver disease (MASLD, met-ALD, and ALD) with preserved ratio impaired spirometry: a population-based study.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study investigated the consistency of the FIB-4, APRI, and GPR indices in assessing significant liver fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019(COVID-19) who also suffer from various liver diseases, providing references for the clinical selection and application for non-invasive assessment methods.
methodsThe study evaluated 744 COVID-19 patients with coexisting liver diseases: 508 cases with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), 158 cases with chronic hepatitis B (CHB), and 78 cases with a combination of both ailments. FIB-4, APRI, and GPR were employed to assess significant liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. Concordance among the methods was determined using Kappa analysis, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves helped identify the optimal cutoff values for each index.
resultsFor COVID-19 patients with NAFLD, Kappa values for significant liver fibrosis were 0.81, 0.90, 0.80, and 0.79, and for cirrhosis, they were 0.88, 0.97,0.88, and 0.88, respectively (all p < 0.05). Among those with CHB, Kappa values were 0.81, 0.81, 0.83, and 0.75 for fibrosis, and0.87, 0.91, 0.88, and 0.92 for cirrhosis (all p < 0.05). In patients with coexisting liver diseases, the values were 0.87, 0.86, 0.86, and 0.78 for fibrosis, and 0.67, 0.69, 0.54, and 0.81for cirrhosis (all p < 0.05). Linear trend analysis revealed significant relationships between FIB-4 values, APRI values, GPR values, and the severity of COVID-19 (χ
conclusionUsing the current cutoff values, the non-invasive assessments demonstrated almost perfect consistency in evaluating significant liver fibrosis and cirrhosis in COVID-19 patients with liver diseases, though FIB-4 and GPR showed moderate consistency in cirrhosis evaluation in patients with coexisting liver conditions. Moreover, it also indicated that increased liver fibrosis correlates with more severe COVID-19 and prolonged coronavirus negative conversion time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.