Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40114041›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2025

Complete plastomes serve as desirable molecular makers for precise identification of Asparagus cochinchinensis (Asparagaceae) and nine other congeneric species frequently utilized as its adulterants.

Xiaorong Guo, Pingxuan Xie, Guangfei Zhang, Tinglu Wang, Jieyan Li, Xinqi Zhang, Weigeng Su, Yunheng Ji

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xiaorong Guo *School of Ecology and Environmental Science, Yunnan Key Laboratory of Plant Reproductive Adaptation and Evolutionary Ecology, Institute of Bioaffiliationersity, Yunnan University, Kunming, China. xrguo@ynu.edu.cn.
Pingxuan Xie *CAS Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, China.
Guangfei Zhang *School of Ecology and Environmental Science, Yunnan Key Laboratory of Plant Reproductive Adaptation and Evolutionary Ecology, Institute of Bioaffiliationersity, Yunnan University, Kunming, China.
Tinglu WangCAS Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, China.
Jieyan LiCAS Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, China.
Xinqi ZhangCAS Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, China.
Weigeng SuYunnan Forest Nature Center (Yunnan Wild Animals and Plants Rescue and Breeding Center), Kunming, China. 916804419@qq.com.
Yunheng JiCAS Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, China. jiyh@mail.kib.ac.cn.

Funding

Yunnan Revitalization Talent Support Program "Top Team" Project 202305AT350001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroudThe processed tuberous roots of Asparagus cochinchinensis (Asparagaceae), known as Asparagi Radix, have long been used in East Asia (particularly in China) as traditional medicines and play an indispensable role in the pharmaceutical industry. However, the frequent adulteration of Asparagi Radix with processed tuberous roots obtained from nine other congeneric species could potentially compromise the quality control measures for related pharmaceutical products, while also posing challenges to the conservation and rational exploitation of the nine adulterant congeneric species that are also used as traditional ethnomedicines. Given this issue, this study aims to develop a molecular authentication method for the accurate identification of A. cochinchinensis and the nine congeneric adulterants, employing the genome skimming approach to generate complete plastid genomes (plastomes) and nuclear ribosomal DNA (nrDNA) arrays as the candidate molecular markers.

resultsThrough comprehensive phylogenetic and genetic distance analyses based on extensive sampling at both inter- and intra-specific levels, the efficacy of the two candidate molecular markers was assessed by investigating whether their inter-specific genetic divergences align with the taxonomically delineated species boundaries.

conclusionThe results indicated that complete plastomes exhibit superior performance for accurately identifying A. cochinchinensis (the botanical source of Asparagi Radix) and the nine congeneric adulterants, thus can serve as the optimal molecular markers for effective authentication of Asparagi Radix. The desirable discriminative power demonstrated by complete plastomes suggests that the PCR-free molecular authentication method developed in this study will not only contribute to the quality control of pharmaceutical products derived from Asparagi Radix but also facilitate the conservation efforts and rational exploitation of the nine Asparagus species commonly used as adulterants.

Indexed as

Asparagus PlantGenome, PlastidDNA, PlantDrug ContaminationGenetic MarkersPhylogenyQuality ControlDNA, PlantGenetic MarkersAdulterantsComplete plastomesDNA barcodingMedicinal plantsSpecies identification

Identifiers

PMID40114041
PMCPMC11924869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.