Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40114016›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A high performance hybrid LSTM CNN secure architecture for IoT environments using deep learning.

Priyanshu Sinha, Dinesh Sahu, Shiv Prakash, Tiansheng Yang, Rajkumar Singh Rathore, Vivek Kumar Pandey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Priyanshu SinhaDepartment of Electronics and Communication, University of Allahabad, Prayag Raj, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Dinesh Sahu *SCSET, Bennett University, Plot Nos 8, 11, TechZone 2, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, 201310, India.
Shiv Prakash *Department of Electronics and Communication, University of Allahabad, Prayag Raj, Uttar Pradesh, India. shivprakash@allduniv.ac.in.
Tiansheng Yang *Pontypridd, University of South Wales, Newport, UK.
Rajkumar Singh Rathore *Cardiff School of Technologies, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, UK. rsrathore@cardiffmet.ac.uk.
Vivek Kumar Pandey *Department of Electronics and Communication, University of Allahabad, Prayag Raj, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growing use of IoT has brought enormous safety issues that constantly demand stronger hide from increasing risks of intrusions. This paper proposes an Advanced LSTM-CNN Secure Framework to optimize real-time intrusion detection in the IoT context. It adds LSTM layers, which allow for temporal dependencies to be learned, and CNN layers to decompose spatial features which makes this model efficient in identifying threats. It is important to note that the used BoT-IoT dataset involves various cyber attack typologies like DDoS, botnet, reconnaissance, and data exfiltration. These outcomes present that the proposed LSTM-CNN model has 99.87% accuracy, 99.89% precision, and 99.85% recall with a low false positive rate of 0.13% and exceeds CNN, RNN, Standard LSTM, BiLSTM, GRU deep learning models. In addition, the model has 90.2% accuracy in conditions of adversarial attack proving that the model is robust and can be used for practical purposes. Based on feature importance analysis using SHAP, the work finds that packet size, connection duration, and protocol type should be the possible indicators for threat detection. These outcomes suggest that the Hybrid LSTM-CNN model could be useful in improving the security of IoT devices to provide increased reliability with low false alarm rates.

Indexed as

CybersecurityDeep learningHybrid LSTM-CNNIntrusion detectionIoT securityMachine learningThreat detection

Identifiers

PMID40114016
PMCPMC11926101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.