ArticleScientific reports2025
Neural correlates of suppressing and imagining future threat.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Subcortical resting state functional connectivity as a neural marker of first onset internalizing disorder in high-risk youth.Neuroimage. Reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Suppressing upsetting thoughts can cause psychological distress but might also enhance mental health when used flexibly to suppress the imagination of future threat during challenging times. To investigate the neural correlates of suppressing and imagining future threat, a cohort of 65 participants underwent a previously examined "Imagine/No-Imagine" paradigm while examining brain activation using magnetic resonance imaging. We observed activity of the inferior frontal gyrus, middle frontal gyrus (MFG), superior parietal lobule, and superior occipital sulcus during thought suppression, whereas imagining future threat elicited activation in the bilateral posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) and ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC). Subjective levels of anxiety, stress, and depression as covariates did not alter these results. To further examine the group and individual-level network dynamics, we conducted dynamic causal modeling (DCM) and group iterative multiple model estimations (GIMME). The DCM model showed that during suppression, the MFG positively influenced the vmPFC and right PCC. In contrast, the vmPFC and the left and right PCC showed positive connections to the MFG during imagining. This suggests that the neural correlates of self-regulation involve an information flow between the PCC and the PFC. In addition, GIMME identified group-level connections between the right and left PCC and between the left PCC and vmPFC, reflecting the information flow during suppression and imagination of future threat, respectively. Considerable interindividual heterogeneity in the connectivity patterns became apparent, pointing to the existence of different biotypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.