ArticleScientific reports2025
Data-driven analysis for the evaluation of cortical mechanics of non-adherent cells.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) analysis of single cells, especially nonadherent, is inherently slow and analysis-heavy. To address the inherent difficulty of measuring individual cells, and to scale up toward a large number of cells, we take a two-fold approach; first, we introduce an easy-to-fabricate reusable poly(dimethylsiloxane)-based array that consists of micron-sized traps for single-cell trapping, second, we apply a deep-learning method directly on the extracted curves to facilitate and automate the analysis. Our approach is validated using suspended cells, and by applying a small compression with a tipless cantilever AFM probe, we investigate the effect of various cytoskeletal drugs on their deformability. We then apply deep learning models to extract the elasticity of the cell directly from the raw data (with a Coefficient of Determination of 0.47) as well as for binary (with an Area Under the Curve score of 0.91) and multi-class classification (with accuracy scores exceeding 0.9 for each drug). Overall, the versatility to fabricate the microwells in conjunction with the automated analysis and classification streamline the analysis process and demonstrate their ability to generalize to other tasks, such as drug detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.