ArticleScientific reports2025
Development and validation of a machine learning-based nomogram for predicting prognosis in lung cancer patients with malignant pleural effusion.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biochemistry-based machine learning algorithms in differentiating pleural effusion: current status and perspective.ERJ open research · 2026Review
- Recent advances in artificial intelligence across interventional pulmonology: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Pleural effusion volume as a novel biomarker for prognostic and therapeutic stratification in small cell lung cancer: a translationally-focused cohort study.Translational lung cancer research · 2026Article
- Article
- Development and multicenter validation of a predictive model for malignant pleural effusion recurrence.iScience · 2026Article
- Advancing Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Management Through Multi-Omics Integration: Insights from Genomics, Metabolomics, and Radiomics.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis risk in papillary thyroid carcinoma based on multiple model comparisons.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Personalized Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is a common complication in patients with advanced lung cancer, significantly impacting their survival rates and quality of life. Effective tools for assessing the prognosis of these patients are urgently needed to enable early intervention. This study retrospectively analyzed patient data from the Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College from 2013 to 2021, which served as the training cohort and internal testing cohort. Additionally, three external testing cohorts were introduced: data from Guang'an People's Hospital as cohort 1, data from Dazhou Central Hospital as cohort 2, and data from the Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College from January 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023, constituting the temporal external testing cohort. Univariate logistic regression (LR) analysis of clinical variables (P < 0.05) was performed, followed by multivariate LR to identify independent predictors for inclusion in nine machine learning models: Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Elastic Net (Enet), Radial Support Vector Machine (rSVM), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), LR, Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN). The best-performing model was used to develop a nomogram for patient risk stratification. Three variables-treatment regimen, presence of pericardial effusion, and total pleural effusion volume-were identified as significant predictors in the study. The LR model demonstrated the best performance, achieving area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.885 in the training cohort, 0.954 in the internal testing cohort, and 0.920 in external testing cohort 1. To further validate the model's robustness, the nomogram developed from the LR model was evaluated in two additional validation cohorts: external testing cohort 2 and a temporal external testing cohort. The nomogram achieved AUCs of 0.962 in external testing cohort 2 and 0.949 in the temporal external testing cohort, demonstrating strong predictive accuracy. Calibration curves confirmed excellent model-reality concordance across all cohorts, and decision curve analysis (DCA) revealed superior clinical utility. The nomogram enabled individualized risk quantification and showed significant survival differences between high-risk/very high-risk groups and low-risk/medium-risk groups. This study evaluated nine machine learning models for prognostic prediction in lung cancer patients with MPE, finding that the LR-based model offered the best performance. A nomogram based on this model can effectively stratify patients for prognostic assessment and early intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.