Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40113936›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Influence of deficit irrigation and biochar amendment on growth, physiology, and yield of cucumber in West Texas.

Arjun Kafle, Sukhbir Singh, Manpreet Singh, Preetaman Bajwa, Sanjit Deb, Catherine Simpson, Glen Ritchie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Arjun KafleDepartment of Plant and Soil Science, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, 79409, USA.
Sukhbir SinghDepartment of Plant and Soil Science, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, 79409, USA. s.singh@ttu.edu.
Manpreet SinghKearney Agricultural Research and Extension Center, University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources, Parlier, CA, 93648, USA.
Preetaman BajwaDepartment of Plant and Soil Science, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, 79409, USA.
Sanjit DebDepartment of Plant and Soil Science, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, 79409, USA.
Catherine SimpsonDepartment of Plant and Soil Science, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, 79409, USA.
Glen RitchieDepartment of Plant and Soil Science, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, 79409, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite growing interest in adopting water-conserving strategies such as deficit irrigation (DI) and biochar amendment in arid and semi-arid regions, there are remarkably few studies conducted on the integration of these two strategies in water limited West Texas region. The aim of this study was to assess the interactive effects of DI and biochar amendment on saturated hydraulic conductivity of soil and the growth, physiology and yield of cucumber (Cucumis sativus) in West Texas. A split-plot design was used to randomize four irrigation treatments (with two levels before and after mid-season) as the main plot [I1: 100% crop evapotranspiration (ETc)-100% ETc, I2: 80% ETc-60% ETc, I3: 60% ETc-80% ETc, I4: 40% ETc-40% ETc] and three biochar rates as subplot [0 t/ha, 15 t/ha, and 20 t/ha] with four replications. Irrigation level I4 negatively impacted chlorophyll content, stomatal conductance, transpiration, photosynthesis, and intrinsic water use efficiency (iWUE) when the weather was hot and dry in 2022 compared to other treatments. Leaf area index (LAI) under I4 declined significantly by 52% and the final dry biomass by 47% compared to I1 across two years, although I3 reduced biomass by 17% only in 2022. As compared to I1, the yield penalties due to water stress in I2, I3, and I4 were 14, 16, and 34%, respectively, across two years. Although biochar rates 15 t/ha and 20 t/ha significantly increased the saturated hydraulic conductivity of soil by 1.6 and 2.2 folds in 2022 compared to the unamended control but biochar's impact on cucumber growth, physiology, and yield was minimum during both years. Hence, our findings suggest that I2 can be adopted as an alternative to full irrigation which requires 25% less water and has 14% narrow yield gap. Biochar studies are needed to assess whether added biochar has an apparent long-term effect on improving cucumber yield.

Indexed as

Agricultural IrrigationCharcoalCucumis sativusChlorophyllPhotosynthesisPlant LeavesPlant TranspirationSoilTexasWaterbiocharCharcoalChlorophyllSoilWaterBiocharCucumis sativusFruit yieldIrrigationOgallala aquifer

Identifiers

PMID40113936
PMCPMC11926378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.