Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40113934›Full record

ArticleNature neuroscience2025

Synaptic plasticity rules driving representational shifting in the hippocampus.

Antoine D Madar, Anqi Jiang, Can Dong, Mark E J Sheffield

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Distinct types of dendritic CaScience advances · 2026
    Article
  3. The hippocampus as a generative model.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Behavioral Timescale Synaptic Plasticity: A Burst in the Field of Learning and Memory.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Behavioral Timing of Interictal Spikes, But Not Rate, Correlates with Impaired Working Memory Performance.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Antoine D MadarDepartment of Neurobiology, Neuroscience Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. madar@uchicago.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5408-7047
Anqi JiangDepartment of Neurobiology, Neuroscience Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Can DongDepartment of Neurobiology, Neuroscience Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4368-4858
Mark E J SheffieldDepartment of Neurobiology, Neuroscience Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. sheffield@uchicago.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0969-7820

Funding

Sub-cellular resolution functional imaging and optogenetic manipulation of identified memory circuits during behaviorDP2NS111657 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI SHEFFIELD, MARK E J · 2018 to 2018
$2.4M
From synapses to neural representations: The role of neuromodulatory circuits in shaping contextual memories in the hippocampusRF1NS127123 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI SHEFFIELD, MARK E J · 2022 to 2022
$1.9M
Investigation of a thalamic-hippocampal pathway in contextual fear suppression and extinctionR01MH136274 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Mark E J Sheffield · 2024 to 2026
$1.9M
Encoding properties of bilateral CA3 inputs and their contribution to the formation and dynamics of CA1 spatial representations in novel environmentsR21NS128822 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI SHEFFIELD, MARK E J · 2022 to 2022
$436k
The role of dentate gyrus input-output computations in episodic memoryF32MH126643 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI MADAR, ANTOINE DAVID · 2021 to 2024
$230k
NIMH NIH HHS F32 MH126643NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH136274NINDS NIH HHS DP2 NS111657NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS128822NINDS NIH HHS RF1 NS127123U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) F32MH126643U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) DP2NS111657
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synaptic plasticity is widely thought to support memory storage in the brain, but the rules determining impactful synaptic changes in vivo are not known. We considered the trial-by-trial shifting dynamics of hippocampal place fields (PF) as an indicator of ongoing plasticity during memory formation and familiarization. By implementing different plasticity rules in computational models of spiking place cells and comparing them to experimentally measured PFs from mice navigating familiar and new environments, we found that behavioral timescale synaptic plasticity (BTSP), rather than Hebbian spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP), best explains PF shifting dynamics. BTSP-triggering events are rare, but more frequent during new experiences. During exploration, their probability is dynamic-it decays after PF onset, but continually drives a population-level representational drift. Additionally, our results show that BTSP occurs in CA3 but is less frequent and phenomenologically different than in CA1. Overall, our study provides a new framework to understand how synaptic plasticity continuously shapes neuronal representations during learning.

Indexed as

HippocampusNeuronal PlasticityAction PotentialsAnimalsMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLModels, NeurologicalNeurons

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.