ArticleScientific reports2025
Comparative analysis of perinatal outcomes in pregnant women with pregestational diabetes mellitus based on diagnostic timing.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of early diagnosis of overt diabetes on pregnancy outcomes: a retrospective cohort study among Brazilian women.Archives of endocrinology and metabolism · 2026Article
- Glycemic Level Modifies the Relationship Between Maternal Gestational Weight Gain and Neonatal Birth Weight in Type 2 Diabetes-Complicated Pregnancies.Diabetes care · 2025Article
- Circulating MicroRNA Profiles in Pregnant South African Women with Different Types of Diabetes Mellitus.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Health Care Providers' Perspectives on Factors Influencing Diabetes Management Among Thai Pregnant Women.Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Diabetes is a major concern in healthcare worldwide and is detrimental to mothers and fetuses during pregnancy. However, half of the women were unaware of hyperglycemia before pregnancy, and there is no consensus on their identification during pregnancy. We aim to understand the role that diagnostic timing plays in perinatal outcomes. This was a multicenter retrospective study of all pregestational diabetes mellitus (PGDM) women who delivered from January 2021 to June 2023. Diagnoses were made before or during gestation. Characteristics and outcomes were compared among stages, and logistic regression was performed to explore the relationship between adverse outcomes and the diagnostic timing. This study included 2,818 women; 1188 (42.2%) were self-aware before pregnancy, and 286 (10.1%), 1208 (42.9%), and 136 (4.8%) were diagnosed in the first, second, and third trimesters, respectively. Maternal body mass index, hypertensive disorders during pregnancy, glucose profile, large-for-gestational-age (LGA), etc., differed among stages (all P < 0.05). Logistic regression revealed that PGDM diagnosed during any trimester was significantly associated with an increased risk of macrosomia (aOR = 2.632, 1.502, 2.314; all P < 0.05). However, the risk of LGA decreased if the diagnosis was based on the 2 h value of the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) alone in the second trimester (aOR = 0.608, 95% CI: 0.444-0.831). No relationship existed between diagnostic timing and neonatal birth defects or hypoglycemia (both P > 0.05). PGDM identified during pregnancy was significantly associated with an increased risk of fetal overgrowth. The role of the 2 h-OGTT alone in diagnosis warrants further exploration. PGDM screening is essential for the entire gestational period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.