Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40113909›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Differences in medical care satisfaction of patients with "functional" vs "organic" esophageal diseases, Italian validation of the PPRS SF questionnaire.

Carlo Soldaini, Antonella Santonicola, Luigi Ruggiero, Angela Caloro, Luca De Leo, Nadia Pallotta, Paola Iovino

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Carlo SoldainiGastrointestinal Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry "Scuola Medica Salernitana", University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy. carlo.soldaini@outlook.com.
Antonella SantonicolaGastrointestinal Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry "Scuola Medica Salernitana", University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy.
Luigi RuggieroGastrointestinal Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry "Scuola Medica Salernitana", University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy.
Angela CaloroGastrointestinal Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry "Scuola Medica Salernitana", University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy.
Luca De LeoGastrointestinal Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry "Scuola Medica Salernitana", University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy.
Nadia PallottaDepartment of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, "Sapienza" University, Rome, Italy.
Paola IovinoGastrointestinal Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry "Scuola Medica Salernitana", University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient-physician relationship (PPR) plays a key role in modern healthcare, especially within gastrointestinal medical practice. In 2017 Kurlander et al. developed a Patient-Physician-Relationship-Scale (PPRS), a questionnaire used to assess the patients' medical care-satisfaction. The PPRS was later simplified by Drossman et al. in 2021 by creating a PPRS-SF (short form). This study aimed to validate the PPRS-SF in Italian and to administer it to patients with "functional" and "organic" esophageal diseases, to highlight the differences in the PPR between the two categories. The process of validation was carried out following a standardized forward-backward procedure and each step was overseen by a Rome foundation independent clinical monitor. The Italian version of the PPRS-SF was then administered to 50 Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE), 53 Achalasia, 48 Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) and 44 esophageal disorders of gut brain interaction (eDGBI) patients. In eDGBI and GERD, the degree of patients' satisfaction was significantly lower. Between a score of -36 and + 36, the mean score for patients with EoE was 30.20 (± 9.78), for Achalasia 23.78 (± 19.9); for GERD 20.46 (± 16.03) and for esophageal DGBI 17.91 (± 18.41). Moreover, there was a negative significant correlation between the PPR and age (R=- 0.208). This study validated the Italian version of the PPRS-SF questionnaire and showed that the patients' diagnosis together with other factors such as their age, can affect the PPR. In particular, patients with DGBI and older patients reported lower scores than the ones with organic diseases and the younger ones, respectively.

Indexed as

Esophageal DiseasesPatient SatisfactionPhysician-Patient RelationsAdultAgedFemaleGastroesophageal RefluxHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesAchalasiaEosinophilic esophagitisEsophageal disorders of gut-brain interactionGastroesophageal reflux diseasePatient-Physician relationship scale

Identifiers

PMID40113909
PMCPMC11926078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.