ArticleScientific reports2025
Risk factors for postoperative surgical complications after inguinal lymph node dissection in penile cancer patients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A focused systematic review and meta-analysis of robot-assisted inguinal lymphadenectomy versus open inguinal lymph node dissection in penile cancer.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Initial experience and technical description of robot-assisted single-port laparoscopic bilateral inguinal lymph node dissection for penile cancer: a report of two cases.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- Article
- The role of robotic-assisted inguinal lymphadenectomy in vulval cancer: feasibility, peri-operative outcomes and oncological safety.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Suprapubic antegrade endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy with great saphenous vein preservation for penile cancer: a stepwise technique (with video).World journal of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- [Central Nervous System Infection After Neuroendoscopic and Microscopic Combined Hematoma Removal: Risk Factors and Construction of a Nomogram Prediction Model].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wound related and lymphatic reflow-related complications are commonly seen in penile cancer patients after inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND). However, the risk factors for them remain unclear. The objective of this study is to identify surgical-related risk factors for complications after ILND in penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) patients. In this study, 192 PSCC patients aged 23-88 were enrolled between October 2008 and October 2023. Univariate analysis and logistic regression were performed to identify risk factors. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to analyze the relationship between certain risk factors and postoperative complications and find cut-off points for certain risk factors. Postoperative complications were observed in 87.5% of patients, with lymphatic fistula being the most common (50.0%) and wound dehiscence the least common (1.1%). Different factors were associated with each complication. Additionally, we found that the retention time of the drainage tube correlates with both lymphocele and wound infection, emphasizing the importance of optimizing drainage tube management to reduce lymphatic and wound-related complications. In conclusion, this study identified specific risk factors for complications after ILND in PSCC patients, particularly the shorter and longer retention times of the drainage tube for lymphocele and wound infection as determined by our multivariate analysis, and proposed new strategies to not only reduce the occurrence of these complications but also accelerate the postoperative healing process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.