Trial reportScientific reports2025
Probiotics reduce the recurrence of asymptomatic bacterial vaginosis in Chinese women.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The role of probiotics in restoring and maintaining vaginal microbiome health: a review.Infection and immunity · 2026Review
- Intravaginal Formulation Strategies for Vaginal Disorders: Optimizing Phytochemical and Biological Preparations-A Review.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Targeting vaginal dysbiosis: prospects for the application of live biotherapeutics products.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Probiotics as a Preventive Strategy for Recurrent Bacterial Vaginosis: A Narrative Review.Cureus · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Asymptomatic Bacterial Vaginosis(aBV)increases the risk of acquiring multiple sexually transmitted diseases, HPV, gynecologic complications and adverse reproductive outcomes, and is speculated to affect 10 ~ 35% of women. Without intervention, a significant proportion of aBV would progress. Metronidazole is the most widely used treatment for aBV, yet the main challenge has always been the high rate of recurrence. Probiotics may increase the cure rate and reduce the recurrence rate of symptomatic bacterial vaginosis (sBV), while no study has compared the efficacy of probiotics and metronidazole on treating aBV. This study aims to fill the gap in understanding the difference in efficacy of probiotics and metronidazole in treating aBV by a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Participants received either a 10-day intravaginal probiotic capsules or a 7-day oral metronidazole. Follow-up were performed at the end of the 1st, 2nd, and 4th week after completing therapy. Women cured by either method were followed up with three additional visits. The primary outcome was the difference of cure rates between the two groups. The secondary outcome was to evaluate the recurrence rates among patients who were successfully cured using either method. 358 participants received probiotics and another 358 participants received metronidazole. The cumulative cure rates at the end of the 1st, 2nd, and 4th week were higher in probiotics group compared to metronidazole group (OR 1.063, P = 0.715; OR 1.324, P = 0.083; OR 1.338, P = 0.071), while the differences were not statistically significant. Women cured (144 in probiotics and 123 in metronidazole) were followed up. The difference of cumulative recurrence rates between the two groups were statistically significant at the end of the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th month (OR 0.212, P = 0.000; OR 0.160, P = 0.000; OR 0.119, P = 0.000). Adverse events were similar in the two groups (8.3%, 9.6% OR 0.858; P = 0.584). No life-threatening or severe adverse events were reported. Probiotics emerge as a superior therapeutic option for aBV due to their comparable cure rates, lower recurrence rates, and minimal side effects. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR1800019436, 11/11/2018 ).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.