ArticleScientific reports2025
Multi-angle study on carbon stock variation and its driving factors in Pingshan County.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aims to investigate the contradiction between the growing demand for ecosystem services and the degradation of these services due to urbanization. Within the context of ecological civilization construction and the "dual carbon" goals, research on the carbon sequestration function of terrestrial ecosystems is particularly significant. Utilizing land-use data from 2000 to 2022, this study employs Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs (InVEST) model's Carbon module to estimate the carbon stock in Pingshan County, using it as a representative example. Geological environmental factors, including elevation, slope, aspect, and degree of relief, were considered with the distribution of geological hazard points and the implementation of relevant policies. Both qualitative and quantitative analyses were undertaken to examine the variations in carbon stock in Pingshan County. The results demonstrate a consistent increase in carbon stock from 2000 to 2022. The geological environment exerts the most significant influence on carbon stock, followed by land-use types, while geological disasters have the least impact. This paper studies the changes in carbon storage and its driving factors in Pingshan County from multiple perspectives. It not only provides theoretical basis and new ideas for the ecological environment protection of Pingshan County, enriching the research results on the carbon cycle of terrestrial ecosystems, but also offers guidance for promoting human-land harmonious development, advancing ecological civilization construction, and achieving sustainable development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.