ArticleScientific reports2025
Multidisciplinary characterization of embarrassment through behavioral and acoustic modeling.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Embarrassment is a social emotion that shares many characteristics with social anxiety (SA). Most people experience embarrassment in their daily lives, but it is quite overlooked in research. We characterized embarrassment through an interdisciplinary approach, introducing a behavioral paradigm and applying machine learning approaches, including acoustic analyses. 33 participants wrote about an embarrassing experience and then, without knowing it prior, had to read it out loud to the conductor. Embarrassment was then examined using two different approaches: Firstly, from a subjective view, with self-report measures from the participants. Secondly, from an objective, machine-learning approach, in which trained models tested the robustness of our embarrassment data set (i.e., prediction accuracy), and then described embarrassment in a dimensional (i.e., dimension: valence, arousal, dominance; VAD) and categorical (i.e., comparing embarrassment to other emotional states) way. The subjective rating of embarrassment was increased after participants read their stories out loud, and participants with higher SA scores experienced higher embarrassment than participants with lower SA scores. The state of embarrassment was predicted with 86.4% as the best of the unweighted average recall rates. While the simple VAD dimensional analyses did not differentiate between the state of embarrassment and the references, the complex emotional category analyses characterized embarrassment as closer to boredom, a neutral state, and less of sadness. Combining an effective behavioral paradigm and advanced acoustic modeling, we characterized the emotional state of embarrassment, and the identified characteristics could be used as a biomarker to assess SA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.