ArticleNPJ primary care respiratory medicine2025
Qualitative insights into planning implementation of FeNO-guided asthma management in primary care.
Article in NPJ primary care respiratory medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inhaled Corticosteroid/Long-Acting βAdvances in therapy · 2026Review
- MicroRNAs as Diagnostic and Therapeutic Biomarkers in Childhood Asthma: A Systematic Review with Bioinformatics Analysis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Skin-lung axis in the atopic march: The immune link from skin to lungs.Chinese medical journal pulmonary and critical care medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) testing is used in primary care in some areas of the UK to aid asthma diagnosis but is used less frequently for managing asthma. A randomised controlled trial (RCT) is investigating whether an intervention, including FeNO testing and a clinical algorithm, improves outcomes for patients with asthma. This study was conducted to explore potential for implementation of the intervention. The study aim was to explore views of those with a vested interest in implementing the FeNO intervention into primary care asthma reviews. In-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted online with individuals, including those with experience in policymaking, healthcare management, National Health Service commissioning, as healthcare professionals (HCPs) with extended roles, and patients and advocates. Inductive thematic analysis was conducted for nineteen interviews. Findings suggest complex interplay of barriers, contextual issues and facilitators. Overall, participants perceived FeNO-informed asthma management would enhance care, if used appropriately and flexibly according to context, for example planning implementation alongside remote reviews. Easier, equitable access to funded FeNO equipment would be needed for national implementation. Participants suggested motivation of all involved in future implementation may be increased by guidelines recommending FeNO, and by use of financial incentives and champions sharing best practice examples. In conclusion, financial obstacles were reiterated as a primary barrier to FeNO use. Despite barriers, facilitating implementation by harnessing prominent cost-benefits could persuade decision makers and clinicians. Findings lay early foundations for development of an implementation strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.