ArticleNature communications2025
The past, present, and future evolution of Aurora Subglacial Basin's subglacial drainage system.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aurora Subglacial Basin (ASB) in East Antarctica is among the most rapidly changing regions in Antarctica. Beneath the ASB, subglacial drainage networks allow for fast ice flow and facilitate mass losses by eroding the coastal ice shelves. The ASB underwent advance-retreat cycles since its inception 34 million years ago, and projections rely on these findings to predict future ice behaviour. Yet, these hindcasts and forecasts seldom consider the effects of subglacial drainage. Here, we model subglacial drainage networks and ice shelf basal melting of the ASB from 34 million years ago to 2100 CE. Our results indicate continual reorganisation of ASB drainage systems and ice shelf melt patterns, suggesting that the past does not fully serve as an analogue for the future. Since subglacial drainage accounts for up to 70% of ice shelf melt, our results imply that subglacial hydrology could trigger higher rates of mass loss than previously suggested.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.