Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40113787›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Experimental wavefront sensing techniques based on deep learning models using a Hartmann-Shack sensor for visual optics applications.

Juan Sebastián Ramírez-Quintero, Andres Osorno-Quiroz, Walter Torres-Sepúlveda, Alejandro Mira-Agudelo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Juan Sebastián Ramírez-QuinteroGrupo de Óptica y Fotónica, Instituto de Física, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Antioquia UdeA, Calle 70 No. 52-21, Medellín, Colombia. juan.ramirez114@udea.edu.co.
Andres Osorno-QuirozPrograma de Ingeniería de Software y Datos, Facultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias Agropecuarias, Institución Universitaria Digital de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.
Walter Torres-SepúlvedaGrupo de Óptica y Fotónica, Instituto de Física, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Antioquia UdeA, Calle 70 No. 52-21, Medellín, Colombia.
Alejandro Mira-AgudeloGrupo de Óptica y Fotónica, Instituto de Física, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Antioquia UdeA, Calle 70 No. 52-21, Medellín, Colombia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wavefront sensing is essential in visual optics for evaluating the optical quality in systems, such as the human visual system, and understanding its impact on visual performance. Although traditional methods like the Hartmann-Shack wavefront sensor (HSS) are widely employed, they face limitations in precision, dynamic range, and processing speed. Emerging deep learning technologies offer promising solutions to overcome these limitations. This paper presents a novel approach using a modified ResNet convolutional neural network (CNN) to enhance HSS performance. Experimental datasets, including noise-free and speckle noise-added images, were generated using a custom-made monocular visual simulator. The proposed CNN model exhibited superior accuracy in processing HSS images, significantly reducing wavefront aberration reconstruction time by 300% to 400% and increasing the dynamic range by 315.6% compared to traditional methods. Our results indicate that this approach substantially enhances wavefront sensing capabilities, offering a practical solution for applications in visual optics.

Indexed as

Convolutional neural networkDeep learningHartmann-Shack wavefront sensorOptical aberrationsVisual opticsWavefront sensing

Identifiers

PMID40113787
PMCPMC11926174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.