Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40113736›Full record

ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2025

Learning to recognize unfamiliar faces from fine-phonetic detail in visual speech.

Alexandra Jesse

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Alexandra JesseDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Massachusetts, 135 Hicks Way, Amherst, MA, 01003, USA. ajesse@psych.umass.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How speech is realized varies across talkers but can be somewhat consistent within a talker. Humans are sensitive to these idiosyncrasies when perceiving auditory speech, but also, in face-to-face communications, when perceiving their visual speech. Our recent work has shown that humans can also use talker idiosyncrasies seen in how talkers produce sentences to rapidly learn to recognize unfamiliar talkers, suggesting that visual speech information can be used for speech perception and talker recognition. However, in learning from sentences, learners may focus only on global information about the talker, such as talker-specific realizations of prosody and rate. The present study tested whether human perceivers can learn the identity of the talker based solely on fine-phonetic detail in the dynamic realization of visual speech alone. Participants learned to identify talkers from point-light displays showing them uttering isolated words. These point-light displays isolated the dynamic speech information, while discarding static information about the talker's face. No sound was presented. Feedback was given only during training. Test included point-light displays of familiar words from training and of novel words. Participants learned to recognize two and four talkers from the word-level dynamics of visual speech from very little exposure. The established representations allowed talker recognition independent of linguistic content-that is, even from novel words. Spoken words therefore contain sufficient indexical information in their fine-phonetic detail for perceivers to acquire dynamic facial representations for unfamiliar talkers that allows generalization across words. Dynamic representations of talking faces are formed for the recognition of unfamiliar faces.

Indexed as

Discrimination LearningFacial RecognitionPattern Recognition, VisualPhoneticsRecognition, PsychologySpeech PerceptionAdultAttentionFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultFace perceptionLearningSpeechTalker identificationTalker variability

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.