ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025
Behind closed doors: a qualitative study exploring the content of fertility discussions between oncologists and their adolescent and young adult cancer patients from the perspective of oncologists at an NCI-designated comprehensive cancer center.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Counseling and use of surrogacy among cancer survivors (CUSACS).Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Article
- Perceived Versus Demonstrated Oncofertility Knowledge Among Oncology Providers.Journal of adolescent and young adult oncology · 2026Article
- "Existential Vacuum" and Axiological Conflict as Correlates of Cognitive-Affective Dissociation in Medical Staff Attitudes Toward Oncofertility in the Pediatric Population-A Preliminary Report.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Fertility preservation in women with cancer: shared decision-making and the essential role of nurses.Women's health nursing (Seoul, Korea) · 2025Article
- Fertility preservation and mental health among cancer patients of reproductive age.Fertility and sterility · 2025Review
- Article
- Are guidelines guiding? A mixed methods study examining the integration of ASCO fertility discussion guidelines in practice among oncologists and adolescents and young adults at an NCI-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2025Article
- Intervention Opportunities to Increase the Delivery of Guideline-Concordant Fertility Discussions for Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo qualitatively explore the content of fertility discussions between oncologists and their adolescent and young adult (AYA; 15-39 years) cancer patients from the perspective of oncologists at an NCI-designated comprehensive cancer center.
methodsWe recruited oncologists of various specialties employed at an NCI-designated comprehensive cancer center in California who treat AYAs at risk for infertility. We collected demographics and fertility-related information (if they discuss fertility with AYA patients and level of confidence doing so) via REDCap prior to conducting a semi-structured interview via HIPAA-compliant Zoom. Audio files were transcribed verbatim and reviewed for themes using an inductive codebook thematic analysis approach.
resultsOncologists (n = 12) were female (66.7%), of White or Asian race (41.7% each), and were on average in practice for 14.3 years (SD = 6.7). All endorsed discussing fertility with AYAs and were on average somewhat/fairly confident doing so. The detail with which oncologists reported discussing fertility with AYAs varied substantially and only some reported discussing costs associated with fertility preservation. Oncologists also reported assorted information they always mention, mention on a case-by-case basis, avoid, or feel is not necessary when discussing fertility.
conclusionThis study provides a detailed description of information delivered by oncologists during fertility discussions to their AYA patients, revealing unstandardized oncofertility counseling. Fertility discussions were described to vary widely in depth and content, suggesting adherence to clinical practice guidelines limited. Interventions to increase provision of guideline-concordant counseling are needed to provide actionable pathways by which AYAs can proactively mitigate adverse reproductive health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.