Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40113535›Full record

ReviewTrends in immunology2025

Decoding microglial functions in Alzheimer's disease: insights from human models.

Chandrika Rao, Stefan Semrau, Valentina Fossati

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chandrika RaoThe New York Stem Cell Foundation Research Institute, New York, NY, USA.
Stefan SemrauThe New York Stem Cell Foundation Research Institute, New York, NY, USA.
Valentina FossatiThe New York Stem Cell Foundation Research Institute, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: vfossati@nyscf.org.

Funding

Integrative Network Biology Approaches to Identify, Characterize and Validate Molecular Subtypes in Alzheimer's DiseaseU01AG046170 · NIA · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI EHRLICH, MICHELLE E, GANDY, SAMUEL E. · 2013 to 2022
$26.0M
Use of iPSC systems to define roles of microglial TREM2/DAP12 and CR3/DAP12 complexes and their genetic variants in specifying risk for late onset sporadic Alzheimer's diseaseR01AG061894 · NIA · NEW YORK STEM CELL FOUNDATION · PI FOSSATI, VALENTINA, GANDY, SAMUEL E. · 2018 to 2022
$4.2M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG061894NIA NIH HHS U01 AG046170
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microglia, key orchestrators of the brain's immune responses, play a pivotal role in the progression of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Emerging human models, including stem cell-derived microglia and cerebral organoids, are transforming our understanding of microglial contributions to AD pathology. In this review, we highlight how these models have uncovered human-specific microglial responses to amyloid plaques and their regulation of neuroinflammation, which are not recapitulated in animal models. We also illustrate how advanced human models that better mimic brain physiology and AD pathology are providing unprecedented insights into the multifaceted roles of microglia. These innovative approaches, combined with sophisticated technologies for cell editing and analysis, are shaping AD research and opening new avenues for therapeutic interventions targeting microglia.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseBrainMicrogliaAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalHumansPlaque, AmyloidAlzheimer's diseasehuman in vitro modelsinduced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs)microgliasingle-cell technologies

Identifiers

PMID40113535
PMCPMC11993344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.