Trial reportJournal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines2025
Sudden gains in modular CBT for mental health disorders in children and young people with epilepsy.
Trial report in Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Disrupted modular and hub topology in right temporal lobe epilepsy: a multimodal MRI network analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSudden gains (rapid, large, stable improvements in symptoms) are common in psychological therapy and are associated with favourable outcomes, but no studies have investigated sudden gains in children and young people (CYP) with a chronic physical condition.
methodsWithin-group study nested in the Mental Health Intervention for Children with Epilepsy (MICE) randomised trial of modular cognitive-behavioural therapy for CYP with epilepsy, utilising goal-based outcomes (GBOs) and standardised session-by-session measures (including the brief parental self-efficacy scale and Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire [SDQ] session-by-session measure). The occurrence and potential predictors of sudden gains, and the association of sudden gains with outcomes at final session and follow-up were investigated using multivariable logistic and linear regression.
resultsAmong 147 participants (mean age: 10.4 years, 49% female) and across nine measures, 39% experienced between two and four sudden gains, most frequently on the mean GBO (occurrence, 44.9%). Characteristics such as intellectual disability, pretreatment scores and the number of sessions received were associated with significantly greater odds of sudden gains in some measures, whereas nonwhite ethnicity and nonemployment of the primary caregiver were associated with reduced odds. Sudden gains were associated with favourable final-session scores for mean GBO (GBO, adjusted mean difference [aMD]: 0.9, 95% CI: 0.3 to 1.6, p = .004, D = 0.63), parental self-efficacy (aMD: 1.2, 95% CI, 0.1 to 2.4, p = .027, D = 0.37) and the SDQ session-by-session measure (aMD: -1.7, 95% CI, -3.0 to -0.3, p = .014, D = -0.44), but not with 6-month adjusted SDQ total difficulties scores.
conclusionsSudden gains were common in this population, occurring most frequently on personalised measures, and were associated with favourable final-session scores. Personalised measures taken at each session with a focus on sudden gains may be a useful adjunct to treatment. Future research and clinical practice should investigate how to increase the occurrence of sudden gains in CYP with long-term conditions receiving psychological therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.