Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40113237›Full record

ReviewFEMS yeast research2025

Advances in CRISPR-enabled genome-wide screens in yeast.

Nicholas R Robertson, Sangcheon Lee, Aida Tafrishi, Ian Wheeldon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in FEMS yeast research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Progresses of transposon research inSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nicholas R RobertsonBioengineering, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA 92521, United States.
Sangcheon LeeChemical and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA 92521, United States.
Aida TafrishiChemical and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA 92521, United States.
Ian WheeldonChemical and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA 92521, United States.

Funding

National Science Foundation NSF-2323984
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-Cas genome-wide screens are powerful tools for unraveling genotype-phenotype relationships, enabling precise manipulation of genes to study and engineer industrially useful traits. Traditional genetic methods, such as random mutagenesis or RNA interference, often lack the specificity and scalability required for large-scale functional genomic screens. CRISPR systems overcome these limitations by offering precision gene targeting and manipulation, allowing for high-throughput investigations into gene function and interactions. Recent work has shown that CRISPR genome editing is widely adaptable to several yeast species, many of which have natural traits suited for industrial biotechnology. In this review, we discuss recent advances in yeast functional genomics, emphasizing advancements made with CRISPR tools. We discuss how the development and optimization of CRISPR genome-wide screens have enabled a host-first approach to metabolic engineering, which takes advantage of the natural traits of nonconventional yeast-fast growth rates, high stress tolerance, and novel metabolism-to create new production hosts. Lastly, we discuss future directions, including automation and biosensor-driven screens, to enhance high-throughput CRISPR-enabled yeast engineering.

Indexed as

Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic RepeatsCRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingGenome, FungalGenomicsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeYeastsMetabolic EngineeringCRISPRforward genetic screeningfunctional geneticsmetabolic engineeringnonconventional yeast

Identifiers

PMID40113237
PMCPMC11995697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.